Exploring Interaction Dynamics in Dog-Assisted Therapy: An Observational Study

(1) Background: Dog-assisted therapy (DAT) integrates dogs into therapeutic sessions to enhance participants' physical, emotional, and social well-being. Despite its growing popularity, little is known about the interaction dynamics between the dog, participant, and therapist during sessions. (2) Methods: This study examined these dynamics, focusing on active participation, focus direction, joint focus, and physical contact. Video data from sessions 1, 5, and 9 of 10 individual therapy sessions with five participants were analysed using behavioural observations and an ethogram. (3) Results: Results indicated that therapists' active participation increased over time while participants' activity levels remained stable. Dogs were most active during the initial and final sessions. Participants' focus on therapists remained consistent, but their focus on the dog stabilised after an initial decline. Dogs are primarily focused on their surroundings. The joint focus between participants and therapists increased, and physical contact with dogs varied significantly among participants and dogs. (4) Conclusions: The findings partially support the "icebreaker" theory, whereby dogs help establish initial rapport. However, the trend was not consistent across all participants. Therapist-dog interactions remained low and stable. Differences in dog characteristics (e.g., breed and fur type) and participant needs may explain variation in physical contact. These findings underline the complexity of DAT and highlight the need for further research into interaction patterns relate to participants and dog characteristics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behavioral Sciences
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15081115
Primary Topic
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring Interaction Dynamics in Dog-Assisted Therapy: An Observational Study

Robert Didden, Candela Jasmin Hüsgen, Nienke Peters‐Scheffer
Behavioral Sciences
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
article

Exploring Interaction Dynamics in Dog-Assisted Therapy: An Observational Study

Robert Didden, Candela Jasmin Hüsgen, Nienke Peters‐Scheffer
article en

Abstract

(1) Background: Dog-assisted therapy (DAT) integrates dogs into therapeutic sessions to enhance participants' physical, emotional, and social well-being. Despite its growing popularity, little is known about the interaction dynamics between the dog, participant, and therapist during sessions. (2) Methods: This study examined these dynamics, focusing on active participation, focus direction, joint focus, and physical contact. Video data from sessions 1, 5, and 9 of 10 individual therapy sessions with five participants were analysed using behavioural observations and an ethogram. (3) Results: Results indicated that therapists' active participation increased over time while participants' activity levels remained stable. Dogs were most active during the initial and final sessions. Participants' focus on therapists remained consistent, but their focus on the dog stabilised after an initial decline. Dogs are primarily focused on their surroundings. The joint focus between participants and therapists increased, and physical contact with dogs varied significantly among participants and dogs. (4) Conclusions: The findings partially support the "icebreaker" theory, whereby dogs help establish initial rapport. However, the trend was not consistent across all participants. Therapist-dog interactions remained low and stable. Differences in dog characteristics (e.g., breed and fur type) and participant needs may explain variation in physical contact. These findings underline the complexity of DAT and highlight the need for further research into interaction patterns relate to participants and dog characteristics.

Behavioral SciencesVol. 15(8)
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Hersenstichting (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.