The challenges of reciprocity: Access, uncertainty, and politics

Ethnographers often engage in practices of reciprocity to ensure that research participants receive some benefit for their participation in research. However, practicing reciprocity involves a series of challenges. This article investigates how events during fieldwork that challenge our identities as researchers influence practices of reciprocity. The article argues that understandings and practices of reciprocity change and develop during research, and highlights that the limits of reciprocity are seldom clear. Drawing on examples from an ethnographic study of a social movement in Sweden, I argue that reciprocity requires constant negotiation, and that the choices we make in situations of identity conflict have direct impact on our analyses. The article concludes in noting that while ethnographers may find different balances between their identities as researchers and their other identities, all ethnographers should be explicit about their concrete ethical choices rather than their abstract principles, as these choices determine the research we produce.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ethnography
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14661381251369680
Primary Topic
Urban Planning and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The challenges of reciprocity: Access, uncertainty, and politics

Colm Flaherty
Ethnography
Urban Planning and Governance
article

The challenges of reciprocity: Access, uncertainty, and politics

Colm Flaherty
article en

Abstract

Ethnographers often engage in practices of reciprocity to ensure that research participants receive some benefit for their participation in research. However, practicing reciprocity involves a series of challenges. This article investigates how events during fieldwork that challenge our identities as researchers influence practices of reciprocity. The article argues that understandings and practices of reciprocity change and develop during research, and highlights that the limits of reciprocity are seldom clear. Drawing on examples from an ethnographic study of a social movement in Sweden, I argue that reciprocity requires constant negotiation, and that the choices we make in situations of identity conflict have direct impact on our analyses. The article concludes in noting that while ethnographers may find different balances between their identities as researchers and their other identities, all ethnographers should be explicit about their concrete ethical choices rather than their abstract principles, as these choices determine the research we produce.

Ethnography
Roskilde University (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Urban Planning and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.