Structural Discourse Markers in German Palliative Care Interactions

The aim of this study is to provide a systematic account of structural discourse markers operating at a conversational macro-level in German Palliative Care interactions, focusing on their frequency, distribution, co-occurrence, and speaker-group-specific usage. By combining qualitative approaches from conversation analysis and interactional linguistics with quantitative methods from corpus linguistics, discourse markers are analyzed together as a functional category from multiple analytical perspectives to enhance the overall understanding of the use of discourse markers. The analysis reveals a functional distribution across different transition points in conversation: Whereas the German so most frequently appears in openings and transitions to non-verbal activities, gut and okay predominate in topic shifts and conversation closings. However, gut and okay differ in their composition of discursive functions, although discourse structuring emerges as the second most frequent function in both cases, an observation that stands in contrast to the continued neglect of this function in standard dictionary entries. The institutional asymmetries inherent in medical interactions are reflected in the finding that both doctors and caregivers use significantly more structural discourse markers than patients and their relatives. Differences between physicians’ and caregivers’ use of discourse markers can be attributed to their different professional roles and communicative responsibilities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Languages
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/languages10080195
Primary Topic
Linguistic research and analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Structural Discourse Markers in German Palliative Care Interactions

Aaron Schmidt-Riese
Languages
Linguistic research and analysis
article

Structural Discourse Markers in German Palliative Care Interactions

Aaron Schmidt-Riese
article en

Abstract

The aim of this study is to provide a systematic account of structural discourse markers operating at a conversational macro-level in German Palliative Care interactions, focusing on their frequency, distribution, co-occurrence, and speaker-group-specific usage. By combining qualitative approaches from conversation analysis and interactional linguistics with quantitative methods from corpus linguistics, discourse markers are analyzed together as a functional category from multiple analytical perspectives to enhance the overall understanding of the use of discourse markers. The analysis reveals a functional distribution across different transition points in conversation: Whereas the German so most frequently appears in openings and transitions to non-verbal activities, gut and okay predominate in topic shifts and conversation closings. However, gut and okay differ in their composition of discursive functions, although discourse structuring emerges as the second most frequent function in both cases, an observation that stands in contrast to the continued neglect of this function in standard dictionary entries. The institutional asymmetries inherent in medical interactions are reflected in the finding that both doctors and caregivers use significantly more structural discourse markers than patients and their relatives. Differences between physicians’ and caregivers’ use of discourse markers can be attributed to their different professional roles and communicative responsibilities.

LanguagesVol. 10(8)
University of Potsdam (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Linguistic research and analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.