Unfavorable disease progression in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia and concurrent t(6;9) translocation (DEK::NUP214 fusion) or inversion 16 (CBFB::MYH11 fusion)

The occurrence of additional specific chromosomal abnormalities in Philadelphia chromosome-positive (pH+) cells is associated with disease progression in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), and is considered a marker that defines the accelerated/blast phase of CML. Both DEK::NUP214 fusion and CBFB rearrangement are extremely rare in CML, and their prognostic significance is unknown. Here we present two CML cases, with one case having concurrent translocation 6;9 [t(6;9)] leading to DEK::NUP214 fusion, and the other one presenting with concurrent inversion 16 -inv(16)- leading to CBFB::MYH11 fusion. The t(6;9) is usually associated with poor prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. In this case, the patient failed to achieve remission and expired. This suggests that the t(6;9) is also associated with poor prognosis in CML. However, more data is needed to verify this association. Detection of inv(16) by karyotyping is technically challenging. In addition, FISH for CBFB is not usually run in the context of CML, thus raising the possibility that similar cases may have been underdiagnosed. With the routine use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) for gene fusion detection, more patients like this one should be diagnosed and treated accordingly. These cases illustrate the importance of a comprehensive molecular/cytogenetic diagnostic work-up.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Genetics
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cancergen.2025.08.004
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.54
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unfavorable disease progression in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia and concurrent t(6;9) translocation (DEK::NUP214 fusion) or inversion 16 (CBFB::MYH11 fusion)

Deepa Jeyakumar, Sherif Rezk, Angela G. Fleischman, Fabiola Quintero‐Rivera et al.
2 citations
Cancer Genetics
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
3.54
article

Unfavorable disease progression in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia and concurrent t(6;9) translocation (DEK::NUP214 fusion) or inversion 16 (CBFB::MYH11 fusion)

Deepa Jeyakumar, Sherif Rezk, Angela G. Fleischman, Fabiola Quintero‐Rivera, Kapitolina Semenova, Xiaohui Zhao, J. Reid, Ying Zhang, Nagulapati Kiran, Lisa Lee
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The occurrence of additional specific chromosomal abnormalities in Philadelphia chromosome-positive (pH+) cells is associated with disease progression in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), and is considered a marker that defines the accelerated/blast phase of CML. Both DEK::NUP214 fusion and CBFB rearrangement are extremely rare in CML, and their prognostic significance is unknown. Here we present two CML cases, with one case having concurrent translocation 6;9 [t(6;9)] leading to DEK::NUP214 fusion, and the other one presenting with concurrent inversion 16 -inv(16)- leading to CBFB::MYH11 fusion. The t(6;9) is usually associated with poor prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. In this case, the patient failed to achieve remission and expired. This suggests that the t(6;9) is also associated with poor prognosis in CML. However, more data is needed to verify this association. Detection of inv(16) by karyotyping is technically challenging. In addition, FISH for CBFB is not usually run in the context of CML, thus raising the possibility that similar cases may have been underdiagnosed. With the routine use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) for gene fusion detection, more patients like this one should be diagnosed and treated accordingly. These cases illustrate the importance of a comprehensive molecular/cytogenetic diagnostic work-up.

Cancer GeneticsVol. 298-299
University of California, Irvine (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
3.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.