Servitization of demand-side energy services: Perspective and insights from energy service providers

The objective of this work is to examine the various aspects related to the market implementation of emerging demand-side servitized energy services. To provide context, the motivations, benefits, risks, and technical challenges related to energy service servitization are analyzed in detail from the perspective of energy service providers. The underlying research question addressed in this study is: what are the key drivers, mechanisms, and outcomes influencing the transition of energy service companies towards servitization, also known as as-a-service (AaS) business models for demand-side energy services. Previous studies on this topic have focused primarily on the conceptual scoping of servitization business models. Consequently, there is a lack of clarity on the market implementation of servitized energy services from the earlier studies. In this regard, feedback from the market players is important to perceive the motivations, benefits, challenges, and risks associated with market-ready as-a-service offers. To this end, this work proposes a methodology that combines desk research, surveys, and semi-structured interviews. Furthermore, the data collected from the interviews are analyzed using the software tool MAXQDA and exploratory data analysis. The combination of data from desk research, surveys, and interviews has provided detailed insights into servitized demand-side energy services (DSES). Findings reveal that transparency in the service value-chain is a prime benefit for companies with servitization offers. It also helps them build long-term trust with end-consumers by sharing valuable data-driven insights. Conversely, regulatory and market risks are cited as major concerns. Notably, on the regulation side, the study identifies barriers that need to be addressed by policymakers in the near future. Finally, the study provides evidence-based recommendations for scaling the servitization business model and addressing the challenges based on new findings from the case study of demand-side energy services. • The study explores servitized business models for demand-side energy services. • Feedback was gathered from companies via desk research, surveys, and interviews. • Transparency, sustainability, and circular economy drive servitization model adoption benefits. • Regulatory and market risks challenge as-a-service models, needing policy action.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Strategy Reviews
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2025.101845
Primary Topic
Smart Grid Energy Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Servitization of demand-side energy services: Perspective and insights from energy service providers

Mahendra Singh, Anne Kesselring, Marian Klobasa, Anı́bal T. de Almeida et al.
Energy Strategy Reviews
Smart Grid Energy Management
article

Servitization of demand-side energy services: Perspective and insights from energy service providers

Mahendra Singh, Anne Kesselring, Marian Klobasa, Anı́bal T. de Almeida, Nuno Quaresma
article en

Abstract

The objective of this work is to examine the various aspects related to the market implementation of emerging demand-side servitized energy services. To provide context, the motivations, benefits, risks, and technical challenges related to energy service servitization are analyzed in detail from the perspective of energy service providers. The underlying research question addressed in this study is: what are the key drivers, mechanisms, and outcomes influencing the transition of energy service companies towards servitization, also known as as-a-service (AaS) business models for demand-side energy services. Previous studies on this topic have focused primarily on the conceptual scoping of servitization business models. Consequently, there is a lack of clarity on the market implementation of servitized energy services from the earlier studies. In this regard, feedback from the market players is important to perceive the motivations, benefits, challenges, and risks associated with market-ready as-a-service offers. To this end, this work proposes a methodology that combines desk research, surveys, and semi-structured interviews. Furthermore, the data collected from the interviews are analyzed using the software tool MAXQDA and exploratory data analysis. The combination of data from desk research, surveys, and interviews has provided detailed insights into servitized demand-side energy services (DSES). Findings reveal that transparency in the service value-chain is a prime benefit for companies with servitization offers. It also helps them build long-term trust with end-consumers by sharing valuable data-driven insights. Conversely, regulatory and market risks are cited as major concerns. Notably, on the regulation side, the study identifies barriers that need to be addressed by policymakers in the near future. Finally, the study provides evidence-based recommendations for scaling the servitization business model and addressing the challenges based on new findings from the case study of demand-side energy services. • The study explores servitized business models for demand-side energy services. • Feedback was gathered from companies via desk research, surveys, and interviews. • Transparency, sustainability, and circular economy drive servitization model adoption benefits. • Regulatory and market risks challenge as-a-service models, needing policy action.

Energy Strategy ReviewsVol. 61
Institute for Systems Engineering and Computers (PT), Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (DE), University of Coimbra (PT)
European Commission, LIFE programme
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Smart Grid Energy Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.