Deep learning-based site-specific prediction of rail joint-gap variations on curved ballasted track using field-measured rail data

Rail joint-gap variations due to thermal and geometric factors are the most prevalent durability challenge for concrete sleepers and track slabs, undermining overall track integrity. This study presents a deep neural network (DNN) model to predict the rail joint-gap variations on curved, ballasted bridge tracks using rail-based field measurements. For model training, 2570 data points (gap, temperature, cant, gauge, and position) were used. Three datasets (right-rail, left-rail, and combined) were used. Model performance was evaluated via MSE, MAE, and R 2 ; the DNN achieved an MAE of nearly 1.3 mm (< 15 % of the mean gap) and R 2 of 0.86 (right) and 0.80 (left). Residuals were near-normal, with over 95 % of predictions within ± 4 mm; bootstrap sampling yielded a narrow 95 % confidence interval for R 2 (0.83–0.89). SHAP analysis showed rail temperature as the primary predictor, with gauge, cant, and position contributing modestly. Incorporating on-site monitoring of fastening health and ballast behavior could further reduce errors. This system can reduce inspection hazards, enhance track safety, and contribute to proactively managing the integrity of railway concrete structures. • Developed a DNN using 2570 noise-augmented in-situ measurements to predict rail joint-gap variations on curved, ballasted bridge tracks. • Achieved MAE near 1.3 mm (< 15 % of mean gap) with R 2 of 0.86 (right rail) and 0.80 (left rail). • Residuals within ± 4 mm for > 95 % of predictions; bootstrap sampling (n = 1000) confirmed a narrow R 2 confidence interval of 0.83–0.89. • SHAP analysis identifies rail temperature as the primary predictor, while gauge, cant, and position exert secondary influences on gap variability.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Case Studies in Construction Materials
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2025.e05198
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Railway Engineering and Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.71

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deep learning-based site-specific prediction of rail joint-gap variations on curved ballasted track using field-measured rail data

Dongho Jeon, Na-Hyun Yi, Inho Yeo, Younghoon Bae
1 citations
Case Studies in Construction Materials
Railway Engineering and Dynamics
0.71
article

Deep learning-based site-specific prediction of rail joint-gap variations on curved ballasted track using field-measured rail data

Dongho Jeon, Na-Hyun Yi, Inho Yeo, Younghoon Bae
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Rail joint-gap variations due to thermal and geometric factors are the most prevalent durability challenge for concrete sleepers and track slabs, undermining overall track integrity. This study presents a deep neural network (DNN) model to predict the rail joint-gap variations on curved, ballasted bridge tracks using rail-based field measurements. For model training, 2570 data points (gap, temperature, cant, gauge, and position) were used. Three datasets (right-rail, left-rail, and combined) were used. Model performance was evaluated via MSE, MAE, and R 2 ; the DNN achieved an MAE of nearly 1.3 mm (< 15 % of the mean gap) and R 2 of 0.86 (right) and 0.80 (left). Residuals were near-normal, with over 95 % of predictions within ± 4 mm; bootstrap sampling yielded a narrow 95 % confidence interval for R 2 (0.83–0.89). SHAP analysis showed rail temperature as the primary predictor, with gauge, cant, and position contributing modestly. Incorporating on-site monitoring of fastening health and ballast behavior could further reduce errors. This system can reduce inspection hazards, enhance track safety, and contribute to proactively managing the integrity of railway concrete structures. • Developed a DNN using 2570 noise-augmented in-situ measurements to predict rail joint-gap variations on curved, ballasted bridge tracks. • Achieved MAE near 1.3 mm (< 15 % of mean gap) with R 2 of 0.86 (right rail) and 0.80 (left rail). • Residuals within ± 4 mm for > 95 % of predictions; bootstrap sampling (n = 1000) confirmed a narrow R 2 confidence interval of 0.83–0.89. • SHAP analysis identifies rail temperature as the primary predictor, while gauge, cant, and position exert secondary influences on gap variability.

Case Studies in Construction MaterialsVol. 23
Korea Railroad Research Institute, National Research Foundation of Korea, Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Railway Engineering and Dynamics
0.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.