Assessment of horizontal shifting errors in open-source DEMs and their impact on 1D hydraulic modeling of meandering river channel

The Ganges River, Bangladesh Horizontal shifting error in open-access GDEMs has received very little attention for detecting and assessing its impact on hydraulic modeling. This study uses three integrated techniques to detect horizontal shifting errors in ASTER and SRTM DEMs by comparing DEM river centerlines and real-time river centerlines, measuring river channel dynamics, and analyzing water level elevation profiles. Four strategies were applied to assess the impacts: evaluating DEM-generated river channels, creating a 1D hydraulic model for inundation mapping, assessing inundation accuracy, and visualizing the horizontal shifts. The results reveal several significant issues. Firstly, both DEMs exhibited notable horizontal shifting errors, with observed maximum, average, and minimum errors of 3200 m, 1800 m, and 680 m, respectively, though the intensity of these errors varied spatiotemporally. Secondly, the maximum riverbed effectiveness (≥73.38 %) was observed in 2000, but subsequently decreased to ≤ 41.25 %, ≤ 47.94 %, ≤ 46.75 %, and ≤ 54.08 % in 2006, 2010, 2015, and 2020, respectively. Thirdly, the horizontal shifting error was found to have severe implications for 1D inundation mapping accuracy. Lastly, strong negative correlation was observed between river channel dynamics and DEM river channel effectiveness (r ≥ -0.963). The results indicate that both DEMs have horizontal shifting errors, which are expected to produce severe inaccurate results in hydraulic and flood modeling, especially in areas with dynamic topography. • Analyzed horizontal shifting error in DEMs and its impact on hydraulic simulations. • ASTER v3 and STRM v3 exhibited significant horizontal shifting errors. • Horizontal shifting errors in DEMs were mostly found in dynamic river channels. • Horizontal shifting errors have a severe impact on 1D hydraulic simulations. • The issue of horizontal shifting errors needs to be addressed in future DEM updates.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hydrology Regional Studies
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2025.102707
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of horizontal shifting errors in open-source DEMs and their impact on 1D hydraulic modeling of meandering river channel

Janet E. Nichol, Md. Latifur Rahman Sarker, Md. Ismail Firoz
Journal of Hydrology Regional Studies
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
article

Assessment of horizontal shifting errors in open-source DEMs and their impact on 1D hydraulic modeling of meandering river channel

Janet E. Nichol, Md. Latifur Rahman Sarker, Md. Ismail Firoz
article en

Abstract

The Ganges River, Bangladesh Horizontal shifting error in open-access GDEMs has received very little attention for detecting and assessing its impact on hydraulic modeling. This study uses three integrated techniques to detect horizontal shifting errors in ASTER and SRTM DEMs by comparing DEM river centerlines and real-time river centerlines, measuring river channel dynamics, and analyzing water level elevation profiles. Four strategies were applied to assess the impacts: evaluating DEM-generated river channels, creating a 1D hydraulic model for inundation mapping, assessing inundation accuracy, and visualizing the horizontal shifts. The results reveal several significant issues. Firstly, both DEMs exhibited notable horizontal shifting errors, with observed maximum, average, and minimum errors of 3200 m, 1800 m, and 680 m, respectively, though the intensity of these errors varied spatiotemporally. Secondly, the maximum riverbed effectiveness (≥73.38 %) was observed in 2000, but subsequently decreased to ≤ 41.25 %, ≤ 47.94 %, ≤ 46.75 %, and ≤ 54.08 % in 2006, 2010, 2015, and 2020, respectively. Thirdly, the horizontal shifting error was found to have severe implications for 1D inundation mapping accuracy. Lastly, strong negative correlation was observed between river channel dynamics and DEM river channel effectiveness (r ≥ -0.963). The results indicate that both DEMs have horizontal shifting errors, which are expected to produce severe inaccurate results in hydraulic and flood modeling, especially in areas with dynamic topography. • Analyzed horizontal shifting error in DEMs and its impact on hydraulic simulations. • ASTER v3 and STRM v3 exhibited significant horizontal shifting errors. • Horizontal shifting errors in DEMs were mostly found in dynamic river channels. • Horizontal shifting errors have a severe impact on 1D hydraulic simulations. • The issue of horizontal shifting errors needs to be addressed in future DEM updates.

Journal of Hydrology Regional StudiesVol. 61
Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JP), University of Portsmouth (GB), University of Rajshahi (BD)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.