Analysis of Undergraduates' Development Paths from the perspective of “Involution”

This study addresses the "involution" dilemma in university education by constructing a evaluation index system encompassing professional, cultural and psychological aspects and exerting Hall's three-dimensional structure. We propose a dynamic modeling method that integrates FP - Growth association analysis with Bayesian network causal analysis, aiming to provide systematic growth path planning through empirical analysis for undergraduates divided into three different target groups including recommended graduates, postgraduates through graduate entrance examination(GEE) and graduates who get the position appointment. Our primary findings include: (1) Overall, the integral routine emphasizes academic foundations, scientific research competitions, and high GPA for recommended students; it focuses on strengthening core subjects and phased preparation for students who intend to get into graduate school by qualifying examination; and it emphasizes professional and professional competitions for students who intend to obtain the position appointment upon graduation. (2) We also find several development directions that are mutually reinforcing, which is to enhance efficiency through the integration of mentor resources, solid achievement of academic practice and time management on weekends. (3) In terms of gender differences, it is suggested that both female and male undergraduates need to break through stereotypes about future-planning and adjust according to their own goals.