Total Intravenous Anesthesia Versus Volatile Anesthetic Maintenance for ACDF Surgeries- An Observational Study

Background: Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) is a common spinal surgery aimed at relieving nerve root or spinal cord compression in the cervical spine. The choice of anesthetic technique plays a pivotal role in ensuring optimal surgical conditions, neurological monitoring, and postoperative recovery. While volatile anesthetics are traditionally used, Total Intravenous Anesthesia (TIVA) is emerging as a preferred alternative due to its favorable hemodynamic and neurophysiological profile. Objective: To compare the perioperative outcomes of TIVA versus volatile anesthesia in patients undergoing ACDF surgery, with specific focus on intubation/ extubation quality, hemodynamic stability, and intraoperative neuromonitoring compatibility. Methods: An observational study was conducted at a tertiary care institute analyzing data from 14 patients who underwent ACDF between July 2022 and March 2025. Of these, 8 received TIVA (dexmedetomidine/propofol-based) and 6 underwent volatile anesthesia. Data were collected in adherence to STROBE guidelines. Key parameters included intubation/extubation quality, Modified Observer Assessment Sedation Score (MOASS), and incidence of peri-extubation events. Results: The TIVA group exhibited smoother extubation with no incidences of coughing, tachycardia, or hypertension, although extubation was marginally delayed. No statistically significant difference was observed in MOASS between the groups. Literature review and supporting studies suggest that TIVA allows better Preservation of Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs), improved hemodynamic stability, reduced Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV), and minimal environmental impact. Conclusion: TIVA appears to offer significant advantages over volatile anesthesia in ACDF surgeries, particularly in preserving intraoperative neurophysiological signals, providing hemodynamic stability, and facilitating safer airway management and recovery. While volatile agents remain widely used, a tailored approach considering patient risk factors and surgical demands may favour TIVA as the anesthetic of choice in select ACDF cases.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Surgery & Anesthesia Research
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47363/jsar/2025(6)243
Primary Topic
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Total Intravenous Anesthesia Versus Volatile Anesthetic Maintenance for ACDF Surgeries- An Observational Study

Kunal Kumar Sharma, Biplav Singh, V. K. Tanwar, S. P. Guleria et al.
Journal of Surgery & Anesthesia Research
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
article

Total Intravenous Anesthesia Versus Volatile Anesthetic Maintenance for ACDF Surgeries- An Observational Study

Kunal Kumar Sharma, Biplav Singh, V. K. Tanwar, S. P. Guleria, Digvijay Singh Thakur, Prashant Dhatwalia
article en

Abstract

Background: Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) is a common spinal surgery aimed at relieving nerve root or spinal cord compression in the cervical spine. The choice of anesthetic technique plays a pivotal role in ensuring optimal surgical conditions, neurological monitoring, and postoperative recovery. While volatile anesthetics are traditionally used, Total Intravenous Anesthesia (TIVA) is emerging as a preferred alternative due to its favorable hemodynamic and neurophysiological profile. Objective: To compare the perioperative outcomes of TIVA versus volatile anesthesia in patients undergoing ACDF surgery, with specific focus on intubation/ extubation quality, hemodynamic stability, and intraoperative neuromonitoring compatibility. Methods: An observational study was conducted at a tertiary care institute analyzing data from 14 patients who underwent ACDF between July 2022 and March 2025. Of these, 8 received TIVA (dexmedetomidine/propofol-based) and 6 underwent volatile anesthesia. Data were collected in adherence to STROBE guidelines. Key parameters included intubation/extubation quality, Modified Observer Assessment Sedation Score (MOASS), and incidence of peri-extubation events. Results: The TIVA group exhibited smoother extubation with no incidences of coughing, tachycardia, or hypertension, although extubation was marginally delayed. No statistically significant difference was observed in MOASS between the groups. Literature review and supporting studies suggest that TIVA allows better Preservation of Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs), improved hemodynamic stability, reduced Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV), and minimal environmental impact. Conclusion: TIVA appears to offer significant advantages over volatile anesthesia in ACDF surgeries, particularly in preserving intraoperative neurophysiological signals, providing hemodynamic stability, and facilitating safer airway management and recovery. While volatile agents remain widely used, a tailored approach considering patient risk factors and surgical demands may favour TIVA as the anesthetic of choice in select ACDF cases.

Journal of Surgery & Anesthesia Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.