In Vitro Assessment of the Effects of Endodontic Sealers on Cell Viability, Adhesion, and Migration

This study aimed to evaluate the in vitro cytocompatibility and bioactivity of the newly launched calcium silicate-based sealer BioRoot Flow, compared with other calcium silicate-based sealers (AH Plus Bioceramic Sealer and BioRoot RCS) and the epoxy resin-based AH Plus Jet. NIH/3 T3 fibroblasts were used to assess cell viability, adhesion, and migration. Material characterisation was performed using SEM, EDS, and XRD. BioRoot RCS exhibited the highest cell viability, while BioRoot Flow showed fewer adherent cells and reduced migration at 72 h. EDS revealed zirconium content in BioRoot Flow, and XRD confirmed calcite presence in all calcium silicate-based sealers. Variations in cell behaviour may be related to differences in chemical composition and surface properties, highlighting the need for further investigation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Endodontic Journal
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.70013
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.79

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

In Vitro Assessment of the Effects of Endodontic Sealers on Cell Viability, Adhesion, and Migration

Ana Cristina Padilha Janini, Anna Carolina Neves Leutz, Victor Augusto Benedicto dos Santos, Adriana de Jesus Soares et al.
1 citations
Australian Endodontic Journal
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
1.79
article

In Vitro Assessment of the Effects of Endodontic Sealers on Cell Viability, Adhesion, and Migration

Ana Cristina Padilha Janini, Anna Carolina Neves Leutz, Victor Augusto Benedicto dos Santos, Adriana de Jesus Soares, Marina Angélica Marciano, Brenda Paula Figueiredo de Almeida Gomes, Talita Tartari, Amanda Nowicki de Salles
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the in vitro cytocompatibility and bioactivity of the newly launched calcium silicate-based sealer BioRoot Flow, compared with other calcium silicate-based sealers (AH Plus Bioceramic Sealer and BioRoot RCS) and the epoxy resin-based AH Plus Jet. NIH/3 T3 fibroblasts were used to assess cell viability, adhesion, and migration. Material characterisation was performed using SEM, EDS, and XRD. BioRoot RCS exhibited the highest cell viability, while BioRoot Flow showed fewer adherent cells and reduced migration at 72 h. EDS revealed zirconium content in BioRoot Flow, and XRD confirmed calcite presence in all calcium silicate-based sealers. Variations in cell behaviour may be related to differences in chemical composition and surface properties, highlighting the need for further investigation.

Australian Endodontic JournalVol. 51(3)
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR), Methodist University of Piracicaba (BR)
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
1.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

In Vitro Assessment of the Effects of Endodontic Sealers on Cell Viability, Adhesion, and Migration — Ana Cristina Padilha Janini, Anna Carolina Neves Leutz, et al. · Australian Endodontic Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS