Distributionally Conservative Stochastic Dominance via Subsampling

ABSTRACT This note defines distributionally conservative versions of stochastic dominance relations based on subsampling. It presents a non‐asymptotic analysis of the probability of the false dominance (FD) error for the empirical version of the subsampling‐based empirical dominance procedure. The analysis is based on the generalization of the McDiarmid's concentration inequality to ‐mixing processes by Kontorovich and Ramanan. The concentration bounds obtained depend on the entropy characteristics of the problem, such as the Lipschitz coefficients of the utilities involved, the FD parameters involved, and the coefficients that represent temporal dependence at each subsample. The analysis establishes tighter concentration bounds for the conservative procedure in both stationary and nonstationary cases when the subsampling rate is appropriately chosen.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Statistical Analysis and Data Mining The ASA Data Science Journal
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sam.70038
Primary Topic
Risk and Portfolio Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Distributionally Conservative Stochastic Dominance via Subsampling

Stelios Arvanitis
Statistical Analysis and Data Mining The ASA Data Science Journal
Risk and Portfolio Optimization
article

Distributionally Conservative Stochastic Dominance via Subsampling

Stelios Arvanitis
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This note defines distributionally conservative versions of stochastic dominance relations based on subsampling. It presents a non‐asymptotic analysis of the probability of the false dominance (FD) error for the empirical version of the subsampling‐based empirical dominance procedure. The analysis is based on the generalization of the McDiarmid's concentration inequality to ‐mixing processes by Kontorovich and Ramanan. The concentration bounds obtained depend on the entropy characteristics of the problem, such as the Lipschitz coefficients of the utilities involved, the FD parameters involved, and the coefficients that represent temporal dependence at each subsample. The analysis establishes tighter concentration bounds for the conservative procedure in both stationary and nonstationary cases when the subsampling rate is appropriately chosen.

Statistical Analysis and Data Mining The ASA Data Science JournalVol. 18(4)
Queen's University (CA), Athens University of Economics and Business (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Risk and Portfolio Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Distributionally Conservative Stochastic Dominance via Subsampling — Stelios Arvanitis · Statistical Analysis and Data Mining The ASA Data Science Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS