Optimal Laser Strike Intensity to Realize “Nonlethal Pain Stimulation Deterrence” in Human‐Wildlife Conflict Management: Wild Boar as a Case Study

ABSTRACT Deterrence is a key component of human‐wildlife conflict management. This study firstly introduced the concept of “nonlethal pain stimulation deterrence,” a kind of deterrence technologies based on painful stimuli which do not cause severe injury to wildlife while realizing effective deterrence through precisely controlling strike intensity. Then, we conducted laser strike experiments on fresh wild boar skin samples and live individuals to assess the relationship between strike intensity and skin injury degree and individual's escape behavior, respectively. We determined the maximum laser power with minimal skin injury through skin experiments (260 W and 1 s in summer, 285 W and 1 s in winter), and the minimum deterrence values (210 W and 1 s) through live animal experiments. The strike intensity parameters determined in this study provide technical specifications for wildlife deterrence at a set distance. To improve field applicability, subsequent experiments should quantify optimal strike intensity along a distance gradient.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Wildlife Letters
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/wll2.70016
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.82

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimal Laser Strike Intensity to Realize “Nonlethal Pain Stimulation Deterrence” in Human‐Wildlife Conflict Management: Wild Boar as a Case Study

Nathan James Roberts, Guangshun Jiang, Zhichun Li, Gang Li et al.
1 citations
Wildlife Letters
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
1.82
article

Optimal Laser Strike Intensity to Realize “Nonlethal Pain Stimulation Deterrence” in Human‐Wildlife Conflict Management: Wild Boar as a Case Study

Nathan James Roberts, Guangshun Jiang, Zhichun Li, Gang Li, Mengqi Zhang, Yanhui Guan, Jinzhe Qi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Deterrence is a key component of human‐wildlife conflict management. This study firstly introduced the concept of “nonlethal pain stimulation deterrence,” a kind of deterrence technologies based on painful stimuli which do not cause severe injury to wildlife while realizing effective deterrence through precisely controlling strike intensity. Then, we conducted laser strike experiments on fresh wild boar skin samples and live individuals to assess the relationship between strike intensity and skin injury degree and individual's escape behavior, respectively. We determined the maximum laser power with minimal skin injury through skin experiments (260 W and 1 s in summer, 285 W and 1 s in winter), and the minimum deterrence values (210 W and 1 s) through live animal experiments. The strike intensity parameters determined in this study provide technical specifications for wildlife deterrence at a set distance. To improve field applicability, subsequent experiments should quantify optimal strike intensity along a distance gradient.

Wildlife LettersVol. 3(4)
Fanjingshan National Nature Reserve (CN), Heilongjiang Academy of Forestry (CN), Northeast Forestry University (CN)
National Key Research and Development Program of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
1.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Optimal Laser Strike Intensity to Realize “Nonlethal Pain Stimulation Deterrence” in Human‐Wildlife Conflict Management: Wild Boar as a Case Study — Nathan James Roberts, Guangshun Jiang, et al. · Wildlife Letters (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS