Assessment of Agreement in the Diagnosis of Retinopathy of Prematurity between Ophthalmology Residents and Retina Specialists
Abstract Introduction: Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) screening is usually performed by a retina specialist. However, the trend of rapidly rising incidence of ROP has placed a greater burden on retina specialists. To ease this burden, ophthalmologists without pediatric or retinal subspecialty training may be trained and charged with ROP screening. Purpose: The purpose is to assess the agreement of ROP diagnosis between the retina specialist and the trained senior residents. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective observational study. ROP screening was done by two trained senior residents (SR1 and SR2) and one retina specialist. Results: A total of 300 babies were screened for ROP with a mean gestational age of 32 ± 2.9 weeks. Sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing any stage of ROP by SR1 were 94.7% and 92.3%, respectively, and by SR2 were 94.1% and 91.89%, respectively. Agreement analysis using kappa statistics showed a kappa value of 0.88 between the retina specialist and SR1, 0.86 between the retina specialist and SR2, and 0.91 between SR1 and SR2. Conclusion: General ophthalmologists and residents trained in ROP screening can, therefore, be charged for ROP screening, while retina specialists can utilize their skills in management of ROP.
Authors
- Sandip Sarkar (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9882-0407)
- Suneel Sangaraju (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6414-3815)
- Pratik Gera
- A. Mary Stephen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1468-2730)
- Shreyas Temkar (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6173-5073)
- Amit Kumar Deb (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1744-9309)
- Jayasri Periyandavan
Institutions
- Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research (IN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- The Journal of Medical Research
- Published
- 2025-05-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.4103/jmr.jmr_17_25
- Primary Topic
- Retinopathy of Prematurity Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00