Reporting quality of extended reality interventions in healthcare: towards a TIDieR XReporting checklist

Abstract Extended reality (XR), including virtual, mixed and augmented reality, is increasingly being utilised within the healthcare industry to assist in providing education, clinical interventions, preparing for and undertaking clinical procedures and surgery, as well as undertaking research that would be otherwise unfeasible through traditional research methods. Recent scoping reviews have highlighted, however, that the reporting of XR interventions has been poor, providing an obstacle for the integration of XR into healthcare. Since being first published in 2014, the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) Checklist has been widely utilised to facilitate the accurate reporting and comprehensive development of clinical intervention protocols. This research aims to investigate the reporting quality of XR interventions and to identify considerations for a TIDieR-XReporting elaboration statement. A cross-sectional study of 150 XR interventions published between 2023 and April 2025 was undertaken to identify items relevant for the consideration in the development of an XR TIDieR elaboration statement. The 37 identified items were only reported 42% of the time within the 150 identified articles. Items relating to safety and implementation such as cybersecurity (1%), screening of relative and absolute contraindications (9%), infection control (13%), and providers’ XR related experience (5%) were poorly reported, indicating that current reporting fails to adequately provide information that would facilitate replication and integration of XR into healthcare. In future, an international Delphi study should be undertaken to further develop and formalise these considerations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Virtual Reality
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-025-01207-z
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reporting quality of extended reality interventions in healthcare: towards a TIDieR XReporting checklist

Lotti Tajouri, Adrian Keith Goldsworthy, Kimberly Alexander, Matthew Olsen et al.
1 citations
Virtual Reality
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
1.88
article

Reporting quality of extended reality interventions in healthcare: towards a TIDieR XReporting checklist

Lotti Tajouri, Adrian Keith Goldsworthy, Kimberly Alexander, Matthew Olsen, Oystein Tronstad
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Extended reality (XR), including virtual, mixed and augmented reality, is increasingly being utilised within the healthcare industry to assist in providing education, clinical interventions, preparing for and undertaking clinical procedures and surgery, as well as undertaking research that would be otherwise unfeasible through traditional research methods. Recent scoping reviews have highlighted, however, that the reporting of XR interventions has been poor, providing an obstacle for the integration of XR into healthcare. Since being first published in 2014, the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) Checklist has been widely utilised to facilitate the accurate reporting and comprehensive development of clinical intervention protocols. This research aims to investigate the reporting quality of XR interventions and to identify considerations for a TIDieR-XReporting elaboration statement. A cross-sectional study of 150 XR interventions published between 2023 and April 2025 was undertaken to identify items relevant for the consideration in the development of an XR TIDieR elaboration statement. The 37 identified items were only reported 42% of the time within the 150 identified articles. Items relating to safety and implementation such as cybersecurity (1%), screening of relative and absolute contraindications (9%), infection control (13%), and providers’ XR related experience (5%) were poorly reported, indicating that current reporting fails to adequately provide information that would facilitate replication and integration of XR into healthcare. In future, an international Delphi study should be undertaken to further develop and formalise these considerations.

Virtual RealityVol. 29(3)
Bond University (AU), Murdoch University (AU), Wesley Research Institute (AU), Prince Charles Hospital (AU)
Murdoch University
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.