Data-driven benchmarking methodology for evaluating PBF-LB/M machines with RMSD Analysis

Abstract Laser based powder bed fusion for metals (PBF-LB/M) is an industrial additive manufacturing (AM) method offering high-precision manufacturing for complex geometries. However, comparing the performance of different PBF-LB/M machines remains difficult, especially when machines are from different manufacturers. This study introduces a new benchmark artifact with standard features for facilitating the evaluation and comparison of machine performance. Two industrial PBF-LB/M machines, EOS M290 and Aconity3D MIDI+, were used to fabricate the part under similar conditions. The additively manufactured (AMed) samples were then inspected using 3D scanning metrology tools, and the results were analyzed using a method called root mean square deviation (RMSD) to measure how far each feature deviates from the original design. The results showed apparent differences in how each machine handled certain features and provide useful information for choosing the right machine based on part geometry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/1332/1/012040
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Data-driven benchmarking methodology for evaluating PBF-LB/M machines with RMSD Analysis

Chinmayee Nayak, Heidi Piili, Nikhil Kamboj, Usama Nadeem
IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
article

Data-driven benchmarking methodology for evaluating PBF-LB/M machines with RMSD Analysis

Chinmayee Nayak, Heidi Piili, Nikhil Kamboj, Usama Nadeem
article en

Abstract

Abstract Laser based powder bed fusion for metals (PBF-LB/M) is an industrial additive manufacturing (AM) method offering high-precision manufacturing for complex geometries. However, comparing the performance of different PBF-LB/M machines remains difficult, especially when machines are from different manufacturers. This study introduces a new benchmark artifact with standard features for facilitating the evaluation and comparison of machine performance. Two industrial PBF-LB/M machines, EOS M290 and Aconity3D MIDI+, were used to fabricate the part under similar conditions. The additively manufactured (AMed) samples were then inspected using 3D scanning metrology tools, and the results were analyzed using a method called root mean square deviation (RMSD) to measure how far each feature deviates from the original design. The results showed apparent differences in how each machine handled certain features and provide useful information for choosing the right machine based on part geometry.

IOP Conference Series Materials Science and EngineeringVol. 1332(1)
University of Turku (FI)
Turun Yliopisto, European Regional Development Fund
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.