Reconciling ecosystem service supply-demand mismatches through ecological compensation in the Tibetan plateau

Accurately identifying ecological compensation (EC) regions and establishing clear compensation criteria are essential for promoting carbon sequestration, mitigating ecological degradation, and supporting equitable resource allocation. In this study, ecological modeling combined with hotspot analysis was applied to quantify the spatial mismatch between ecosystem service (ES) supply and demand on the Tibetan Plateau (TP) in 2020. We introduced the concept of comparative ecological radiation force (CERF) to characterize the spatial flow of ESs and to estimate the total compensation required to balance these flows. Our results highlight that the value of carbon sequestration, represented by net primary production (NPP), reached 1.21 × 10⁶ CNY, alongside other key services such as soil conservation (SC) (284.69 × 10<sup>6</sup> CNY), water yield (WY) (44.99 × 10<sup>6</sup> CNY) and food supply (FS) (20.81 × 10<sup>6</sup> CNY). The directional analysis of service flows revealed that NPP, along with SC and WY, predominantly flowed from east to west, while FS exhibited a north-to-south pattern. Notably, NPP received only 0.16% of the total ecological compensation, in contrast to 95.42% for SC, 4.21% for WY, and 0.21% for FS. This study provides an integrated framework for aligning EC strategies with carbon management goals, offering insights to support carbon neutrality efforts and ecosystem restoration on the TP.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Carbon Balance and Management
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-025-00325-0
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.84
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reconciling ecosystem service supply-demand mismatches through ecological compensation in the Tibetan plateau

Jitao Zhou, Liu Xue-ren, Wenjie Yao, Xiaofeng Wang et al.
2 citations
Carbon Balance and Management
Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
4.84
article

Reconciling ecosystem service supply-demand mismatches through ecological compensation in the Tibetan plateau

Jitao Zhou, Liu Xue-ren, Wenjie Yao, Xiaofeng Wang, Xiaoxue Wang, Jiahao Ma, Xinrong Zhang, Zechong Sun, You Tu, Xiaoming Feng, Zixu Jia
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Accurately identifying ecological compensation (EC) regions and establishing clear compensation criteria are essential for promoting carbon sequestration, mitigating ecological degradation, and supporting equitable resource allocation. In this study, ecological modeling combined with hotspot analysis was applied to quantify the spatial mismatch between ecosystem service (ES) supply and demand on the Tibetan Plateau (TP) in 2020. We introduced the concept of comparative ecological radiation force (CERF) to characterize the spatial flow of ESs and to estimate the total compensation required to balance these flows. Our results highlight that the value of carbon sequestration, represented by net primary production (NPP), reached 1.21 × 10⁶ CNY, alongside other key services such as soil conservation (SC) (284.69 × 10<sup>6</sup> CNY), water yield (WY) (44.99 × 10<sup>6</sup> CNY) and food supply (FS) (20.81 × 10<sup>6</sup> CNY). The directional analysis of service flows revealed that NPP, along with SC and WY, predominantly flowed from east to west, while FS exhibited a north-to-south pattern. Notably, NPP received only 0.16% of the total ecological compensation, in contrast to 95.42% for SC, 4.21% for WY, and 0.21% for FS. This study provides an integrated framework for aligning EC strategies with carbon management goals, offering insights to support carbon neutrality efforts and ecosystem restoration on the TP.

Carbon Balance and ManagementVol. 20(1)
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Chang'an University (CN), Institute of Urban Environment (CN), Gansu Coalfield Geology Bureau (CN), China National Administration of Coal Geology (CN), Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences (CN), China Coal Technology and Engineering Group Corp (China) (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
4.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.