Moving Beyond Temperature Metrics in Coral Bleaching Prediction Using Interpretable Machine Learning

ABSTRACT Aim Marine heatwaves are the greatest threat to coral reefs, but the interplay between other physical environmental factors often influences the thermal sensitivity of corals. While existing coral bleaching algorithms largely depend on temperature‐related metrics, such relationships may not hold under climate change when corals experience thermal and environmental variability that may shape bleaching susceptibility. Our aim is to use an interpretable machine learning‐based approach to explore the effects and critical thresholds of thermal history and environmental drivers on bleaching outcomes. Time Period 2016–2020. Location Great Barrier Reef (GBR), Australia. Major Taxa Studied Scleractinia corals. Methods A spatially cross‐validated ordinal random forest model was applied to predict 2643 observed coral bleaching outcomes of three levels using 19 potentially informative environmental parameters (i.e., predictors) across three bleaching events on the GBR. We estimated the importance and marginal effects of each predictor using the SHapley Additive exPlanations method. Using the 10 most important predictors, we then fitted and applied a model to predict bleaching on unsurveyed reefs with predictor properties that the model had high confidence in. Results Our model predicted bleaching intensities with 80% accuracy. While accumulated heat stress was the strongest predictor, non‐linear interactions between drivers resolved observed bleaching outcomes and showed that heat stress alone could not always predict bleaching responses. Reefs with weak currents or high water clarity showed higher bleaching risk even with moderate heat stress. Severely heated reefs with high cloud cover or recent exposure to higher thermal stress exhibited lower bleaching risk. Main Conclusions We show that corals respond to acute heat stress differently depending on thermal history, water flow and light availability. Integrating environmental heterogeneity into coral bleaching algorithms, reef vulnerability assessment and spatial conservation planning will be critical for identifying bleaching refugia, facilitating coral adaptation and supporting reef persistence under climate change.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Ecology and Biogeography
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.70105
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.87

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Moving Beyond Temperature Metrics in Coral Bleaching Prediction Using Interpretable Machine Learning

Peter J. Mumby, Milani Chaloupka, Mandy W. M. Cheung, Karlo Hock
4 citations
Global Ecology and Biogeography
Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
6.87
article

Moving Beyond Temperature Metrics in Coral Bleaching Prediction Using Interpretable Machine Learning

Peter J. Mumby, Milani Chaloupka, Mandy W. M. Cheung, Karlo Hock
article en
4 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aim Marine heatwaves are the greatest threat to coral reefs, but the interplay between other physical environmental factors often influences the thermal sensitivity of corals. While existing coral bleaching algorithms largely depend on temperature‐related metrics, such relationships may not hold under climate change when corals experience thermal and environmental variability that may shape bleaching susceptibility. Our aim is to use an interpretable machine learning‐based approach to explore the effects and critical thresholds of thermal history and environmental drivers on bleaching outcomes. Time Period 2016–2020. Location Great Barrier Reef (GBR), Australia. Major Taxa Studied Scleractinia corals. Methods A spatially cross‐validated ordinal random forest model was applied to predict 2643 observed coral bleaching outcomes of three levels using 19 potentially informative environmental parameters (i.e., predictors) across three bleaching events on the GBR. We estimated the importance and marginal effects of each predictor using the SHapley Additive exPlanations method. Using the 10 most important predictors, we then fitted and applied a model to predict bleaching on unsurveyed reefs with predictor properties that the model had high confidence in. Results Our model predicted bleaching intensities with 80% accuracy. While accumulated heat stress was the strongest predictor, non‐linear interactions between drivers resolved observed bleaching outcomes and showed that heat stress alone could not always predict bleaching responses. Reefs with weak currents or high water clarity showed higher bleaching risk even with moderate heat stress. Severely heated reefs with high cloud cover or recent exposure to higher thermal stress exhibited lower bleaching risk. Main Conclusions We show that corals respond to acute heat stress differently depending on thermal history, water flow and light availability. Integrating environmental heterogeneity into coral bleaching algorithms, reef vulnerability assessment and spatial conservation planning will be critical for identifying bleaching refugia, facilitating coral adaptation and supporting reef persistence under climate change.

Global Ecology and BiogeographyVol. 34(8)
The University of Queensland (AU)
Australian Government, University of Queensland
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
6.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.