Can we cross? Exploring the epistemic-linguistic line in an in-service teacher education context

Educational institutions do not merely spread or construct knowledge, but also define what knowledges are worth knowing and what even counts as knowledge. We draw on prior scholarship to discuss knowledge differentiation as an epistemic line , which defines which and whose knowledges count. The hegemony of Eurocentric knowledge systems affects educational institutions in Europe and beyond. In this article, we analyze data from a series of four teacher workshops that we offered in a Finnish adult basic education (ABE) center that serves learners with forced migration background mostly from West Asian and African countries. Together with our teacher participants, we ask Can we cross epistemic lines? Our analysis of transcribed audio-recordings, fieldnotes, and open-ended, semi-structured interviews with the teacher participants shows that teachers reinscribed epistemic lines (e.g. via linguistic and cultural normativity), but also blurred and crossed them by drawing on their own individual and collective knowledges. The study points to the intertwinedness of students’ and teachers’ epistemic legitimacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Educational Research Journal
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14749041251359707
Primary Topic
Global Educational Policies and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can we cross? Exploring the epistemic-linguistic line in an in-service teacher education context

Saara Jäntti, Sanna Riuttanen, Johanna Ennser‐Kananen
2 links
European Educational Research Journal
Global Educational Policies and Reforms
article

Can we cross? Exploring the epistemic-linguistic line in an in-service teacher education context

Saara Jäntti, Sanna Riuttanen, Johanna Ennser‐Kananen
article en

Abstract

Educational institutions do not merely spread or construct knowledge, but also define what knowledges are worth knowing and what even counts as knowledge. We draw on prior scholarship to discuss knowledge differentiation as an epistemic line , which defines which and whose knowledges count. The hegemony of Eurocentric knowledge systems affects educational institutions in Europe and beyond. In this article, we analyze data from a series of four teacher workshops that we offered in a Finnish adult basic education (ABE) center that serves learners with forced migration background mostly from West Asian and African countries. Together with our teacher participants, we ask Can we cross epistemic lines? Our analysis of transcribed audio-recordings, fieldnotes, and open-ended, semi-structured interviews with the teacher participants shows that teachers reinscribed epistemic lines (e.g. via linguistic and cultural normativity), but also blurred and crossed them by drawing on their own individual and collective knowledges. The study points to the intertwinedness of students’ and teachers’ epistemic legitimacy.

European Educational Research JournalVol. 25(2)
University of Jyväskylä (FI)
Academy of Finland
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Global Educational Policies and Reforms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Can we cross? Exploring the epistemic-linguistic line in an in-service teacher education context — Saara Jäntti, Sanna Riuttanen, et al. · European Educational Research Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS