Maintenance Treatment with 5-Azacitidine in Patients with Acute Myeloblastic Leukemia Ineligible for Intensive Treatment and with Response After Induction Chemotherapy: A Phase II Clinical Trial

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: After first-line treatment, elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) often become unfit to continue intensive chemotherapy despite having achieved a response. This trial aimed to determine the efficacy of maintenance treatment with azacitidine in AML patients who are ineligible to continue intensive treatment after remission. <b>Methods</b>: A single-arm, multicenter, phase II clinical trial (EudraCT: 2010-020432-18) including patients with AML with complete (CR) or partial remission (PR) after one or two cycles of intensive induction chemotherapy and ineligible to continue intensive treatment was conducted. Efficacy was measured as the response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS), and was assessed in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population (all patients). Quality of life was also assessed. <b>Results</b>: Thirty-two patients were included, with a mean age of 73.3 years (SD 3.8) (53.1% male); sixteen patients (50.0%) reached the sixth treatment cycle. The best response was CR in 11 patients (68.8%) and PR in 2 patients (12.5%) at cycle six, and CR in 15 patients (46.9%) and PR in 5 patients (15.6%) overall. The median PFS was 6.7 months (95% CI 3.1-8.7), and OS was 11.5 months (95% CI 6.6-15.9). The daily function (<i>p</i> = 0.0296), cognitive function (<i>p</i> = 0.0412), and social function (<i>p</i> = 0.0275) scales of the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire significantly improved. Thirty-one patients (96.9%) experienced adverse events; six (1.9%) were serious. <b>Conclusions</b>: Azacitidine is a safe and well-tolerated maintenance treatment option for AML patients unfit for intensive therapy following a response to induction, although the single-arm phase II design precludes direct causal inference. Patients achieved promising results regarding PFS and remission rates, with improved quality of life.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17162678
Primary Topic
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Maintenance Treatment with 5-Azacitidine in Patients with Acute Myeloblastic Leukemia Ineligible for Intensive Treatment and with Response After Induction Chemotherapy: A Phase II Clinical Trial

Mar Tormo, Maria García Fortes, A. de la Fuente, Alfonso Fernandez et al.
Cancers
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
article

Maintenance Treatment with 5-Azacitidine in Patients with Acute Myeloblastic Leukemia Ineligible for Intensive Treatment and with Response After Induction Chemotherapy: A Phase II Clinical Trial

Mar Tormo, Maria García Fortes, A. de la Fuente, Alfonso Fernandez, Miguel Ángel Sánchez Chaparro, Rebeca Cuello García, M.‐Pilar Marco, Regina García Delgado, Josefina Serrano López, Manuel Pérez
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: After first-line treatment, elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) often become unfit to continue intensive chemotherapy despite having achieved a response. This trial aimed to determine the efficacy of maintenance treatment with azacitidine in AML patients who are ineligible to continue intensive treatment after remission. <b>Methods</b>: A single-arm, multicenter, phase II clinical trial (EudraCT: 2010-020432-18) including patients with AML with complete (CR) or partial remission (PR) after one or two cycles of intensive induction chemotherapy and ineligible to continue intensive treatment was conducted. Efficacy was measured as the response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS), and was assessed in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population (all patients). Quality of life was also assessed. <b>Results</b>: Thirty-two patients were included, with a mean age of 73.3 years (SD 3.8) (53.1% male); sixteen patients (50.0%) reached the sixth treatment cycle. The best response was CR in 11 patients (68.8%) and PR in 2 patients (12.5%) at cycle six, and CR in 15 patients (46.9%) and PR in 5 patients (15.6%) overall. The median PFS was 6.7 months (95% CI 3.1-8.7), and OS was 11.5 months (95% CI 6.6-15.9). The daily function (<i>p</i> = 0.0296), cognitive function (<i>p</i> = 0.0412), and social function (<i>p</i> = 0.0275) scales of the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire significantly improved. Thirty-one patients (96.9%) experienced adverse events; six (1.9%) were serious. <b>Conclusions</b>: Azacitidine is a safe and well-tolerated maintenance treatment option for AML patients unfit for intensive therapy following a response to induction, although the single-arm phase II design precludes direct causal inference. Patients achieved promising results regarding PFS and remission rates, with improved quality of life.

CancersVol. 17(16)
Hospital Costa del Sol (ES), Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia (ES), Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía (ES), Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset (ES), Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Victoria (ES), MD Anderson Cancer Center Madrid (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.