The populist radical right, the gender gap and protective masculinity across European countries

Various studies show that men disproportionately vote for populist radical right (PRR) parties. However, research has been unable to fully explain this gender gap. In an attempt to address this research gap, this article theorizes, quantitatively operationalizes and tests the role of ‘protective masculinity’ in the gender gap in PRR support in a cross-sectional study across 18 European countries. Using mediation analysis, we find that ‘protective masculinity’ partly explains the gender gap in PRR support. However, while more men than women hold ‘protective masculinity’ attitudes, women also do. Moderation analysis shows that these women are equally likely as men to support the PRR based on these attitudes. Bridging previous qualitative research on masculinity and quantitative research on PRR support, this article contributes a partial explanation of the gender gap. Its findings call for research on women’s conservatism and PRR support.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Politics and Gender
Published
2025-08-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1332/25151088y2025d000000101
Primary Topic
Social Issues and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The populist radical right, the gender gap and protective masculinity across European countries

Katarzyna Wojnicka, Gefjon Off, Kathina Mehring
European Journal of Politics and Gender
Social Issues and Policies
article

The populist radical right, the gender gap and protective masculinity across European countries

Katarzyna Wojnicka, Gefjon Off, Kathina Mehring
article en

Abstract

Various studies show that men disproportionately vote for populist radical right (PRR) parties. However, research has been unable to fully explain this gender gap. In an attempt to address this research gap, this article theorizes, quantitatively operationalizes and tests the role of ‘protective masculinity’ in the gender gap in PRR support in a cross-sectional study across 18 European countries. Using mediation analysis, we find that ‘protective masculinity’ partly explains the gender gap in PRR support. However, while more men than women hold ‘protective masculinity’ attitudes, women also do. Moderation analysis shows that these women are equally likely as men to support the PRR based on these attitudes. Bridging previous qualitative research on masculinity and quantitative research on PRR support, this article contributes a partial explanation of the gender gap. Its findings call for research on women’s conservatism and PRR support.

European Journal of Politics and Gender
Leuphana University of Lüneburg (DE), Universität Hamburg (DE), University of Gothenburg (SE)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Social Issues and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.