Comparative Analysis of Wavelet Bases for Solving First-Kind Fredholm Integral Equations

This research presents a comparative analysis of numerical methods for solving first-kind Fredholm integral equations using the Bubnov–Galerkin method with various wavelet and orthogonal polynomial bases. The bases considered are constructed from Legendre, Laguerre, Chebyshev, and Hermite wavelets, as well as Alpert multiwavelets and CAS wavelets. The effectiveness of these bases is evaluated by measuring errors relative to known analytical solutions at different discretization levels. Results show that global orthogonal systems—particularly the Chebyshev and Hermite—achieve the lowest error norms for smooth target functions. CAS wavelets, due to their localized and oscillatory nature, produce higher errors, though their accuracy improves with finer discretization. The analysis has been extended to incorporate perturbations in the form of additive noise, enabling a rigorous assessment of the method’s stability with respect to different wavelet bases. This approach provides insight into the robustness of the numerical scheme under data uncertainty and highlights the sensitivity of each basis to noise-induced errors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computation
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/computation13080199
Primary Topic
Image and Signal Denoising Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Wavelet Bases for Solving First-Kind Fredholm Integral Equations

Nurlan Temirbekov, Dinara Tamabay, Aigerim M. Tleulesova, Tomiris Mukhanova
Computation
Image and Signal Denoising Methods
article

Comparative Analysis of Wavelet Bases for Solving First-Kind Fredholm Integral Equations

Nurlan Temirbekov, Dinara Tamabay, Aigerim M. Tleulesova, Tomiris Mukhanova
article en

Abstract

This research presents a comparative analysis of numerical methods for solving first-kind Fredholm integral equations using the Bubnov–Galerkin method with various wavelet and orthogonal polynomial bases. The bases considered are constructed from Legendre, Laguerre, Chebyshev, and Hermite wavelets, as well as Alpert multiwavelets and CAS wavelets. The effectiveness of these bases is evaluated by measuring errors relative to known analytical solutions at different discretization levels. Results show that global orthogonal systems—particularly the Chebyshev and Hermite—achieve the lowest error norms for smooth target functions. CAS wavelets, due to their localized and oscillatory nature, produce higher errors, though their accuracy improves with finer discretization. The analysis has been extended to incorporate perturbations in the form of additive noise, enabling a rigorous assessment of the method’s stability with respect to different wavelet bases. This approach provides insight into the robustness of the numerical scheme under data uncertainty and highlights the sensitivity of each basis to noise-induced errors.

ComputationVol. 13(8)
Al-Farabi Kazakh National University (KZ), National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan (KZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Image and Signal Denoising Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.