When and how visual aesthetic features influence approach–avoidance motivated behavior

For decades, researchers have explored the relationship between aesthetic features such as symmetry and complexity and preference. Likewise, philosophers and psychologists alike have pondered the differences between preference and behavior. Nevertheless, little is known about the relationship between aesthetic preference and motivation. Using an online approach-avoidance motivation task, we compare the reaction times between congruent (aesthetic preference + approach) and incongruent (aesthetic preference + avoidance) conditions. In Experiment 1, we explore the relationship between symmetry and complexity and approach-avoidance motivated behavior. In Experiment 2, we distinguish the mechanisms in play in the relationship by manipulating presentation and decision-making time. In Experiment 3, we assess the generalizability of the results beyond abstract graphical patterns. Overall, our research advances knowledge of the relationship between aesthetic preferences for features like symmetry and complexity and approach-avoidance motivation, and it has implications for fields such as marketing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218251371660
Primary Topic
Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When and how visual aesthetic features influence approach–avoidance motivated behavior

Maria Pombo, Andrew J. Elliot, Guido Corradi, Carlos Velasco
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
article

When and how visual aesthetic features influence approach–avoidance motivated behavior

Maria Pombo, Andrew J. Elliot, Guido Corradi, Carlos Velasco
article en

Abstract

For decades, researchers have explored the relationship between aesthetic features such as symmetry and complexity and preference. Likewise, philosophers and psychologists alike have pondered the differences between preference and behavior. Nevertheless, little is known about the relationship between aesthetic preference and motivation. Using an online approach-avoidance motivation task, we compare the reaction times between congruent (aesthetic preference + approach) and incongruent (aesthetic preference + avoidance) conditions. In Experiment 1, we explore the relationship between symmetry and complexity and approach-avoidance motivated behavior. In Experiment 2, we distinguish the mechanisms in play in the relationship by manipulating presentation and decision-making time. In Experiment 3, we assess the generalizability of the results beyond abstract graphical patterns. Overall, our research advances knowledge of the relationship between aesthetic preferences for features like symmetry and complexity and approach-avoidance motivation, and it has implications for fields such as marketing.

Quarterly Journal of Experimental PsychologyVol. 79(3)
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES), BI Norwegian Business School (NO), Universitat de les Illes Balears (ES), University of Rochester (US), New York University (US)
Asahi Group Holdings
Reduced inequalities, Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

When and how visual aesthetic features influence approach–avoidance motivated behavior — Maria Pombo, Andrew J. Elliot, et al. · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS