306. EMOTIONAL FACES MEMORY TASK PERFORMANCE AND CLINICAL OUTCOMES FOR THE NOVEL PRESCRIPTION DIGITAL THERAPEUTIC, CT-152

Abstract Background CT-152 received US Food and Drug Administration 510(k)-clearance as a prescription digital therapeutic adjunct to antidepressant medication in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). CT-152 provides a novel mechanism of action through use of the Emotional Faces Memory Task (EFMT). Aims & Objectives This post hoc analysis correlated change in the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score change from baseline to the end of the intervention and extension periods with participants' memory-task performance. Method In the Phase 3 Mirai trial (6-week intervention/4-week extension periods), adults (22–64 years) with MDD and inadequate response to current antidepressant medication were randomly assigned to CT-152 or sham smartphone apps. CT-152 includes EFMT and CBT-based lessons; sham includes a time/attention/expectation-matched memory-task. EFMT is a N-back task that requires participants to recall sequences of facial emotions displayed N-steps prior, where N-values increased as a function of performance accuracy. This post hoc analysis correlated change in MADRS scores from baseline to weeks 6 and 10 with participants' memory-task performance (EFMT or sham). Results Participants (N=386) were randomly assigned to CT-152 (n=194) or sham (n=192). EFMT performance was measured by maximum N-back level achieved, rounds completed at N-back>1, and EFMT sessions completed. EFMT performance was correlated with MADRS outcomes; for example, the number of rounds attained at N-back>1 predicted both Week 6 and 10 MADRS outcomes. Achieving N-back=3 during the first EFMT was also predictive of MADRS improvement at Week 6; however, achieving the difficulty threshold N-back≥5 overall was not correlated with MADRS outcomes. Importantly, no relationship was observed between sham-app memory-task performance and MADRS outcomes. Discussion & Conclusions CT-152 EFMT, but not sham-app performance, was correlated with MADRS improvements, highlighting EFMT therapeutic effects even for participants who did not achieve more difficult N-back thresholds.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ijnp/pyaf052.044
Primary Topic
Digital Mental Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

306. EMOTIONAL FACES MEMORY TASK PERFORMANCE AND CLINICAL OUTCOMES FOR THE NOVEL PRESCRIPTION DIGITAL THERAPEUTIC, CT-152

Jeffrey M. Cochran, Timothy Peters-Strickland, Hui Jiang, Miriam Petrová et al.
The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology
Digital Mental Health Interventions
article

306. EMOTIONAL FACES MEMORY TASK PERFORMANCE AND CLINICAL OUTCOMES FOR THE NOVEL PRESCRIPTION DIGITAL THERAPEUTIC, CT-152

Jeffrey M. Cochran, Timothy Peters-Strickland, Hui Jiang, Miriam Petrová, Thomas Owen Carlton, Andrew Forbes, Joan S. Ash, Danielle Carpenter, Brian Rothman, Zhe Zhang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background CT-152 received US Food and Drug Administration 510(k)-clearance as a prescription digital therapeutic adjunct to antidepressant medication in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). CT-152 provides a novel mechanism of action through use of the Emotional Faces Memory Task (EFMT). Aims & Objectives This post hoc analysis correlated change in the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score change from baseline to the end of the intervention and extension periods with participants' memory-task performance. Method In the Phase 3 Mirai trial (6-week intervention/4-week extension periods), adults (22–64 years) with MDD and inadequate response to current antidepressant medication were randomly assigned to CT-152 or sham smartphone apps. CT-152 includes EFMT and CBT-based lessons; sham includes a time/attention/expectation-matched memory-task. EFMT is a N-back task that requires participants to recall sequences of facial emotions displayed N-steps prior, where N-values increased as a function of performance accuracy. This post hoc analysis correlated change in MADRS scores from baseline to weeks 6 and 10 with participants' memory-task performance (EFMT or sham). Results Participants (N=386) were randomly assigned to CT-152 (n=194) or sham (n=192). EFMT performance was measured by maximum N-back level achieved, rounds completed at N-back>1, and EFMT sessions completed. EFMT performance was correlated with MADRS outcomes; for example, the number of rounds attained at N-back>1 predicted both Week 6 and 10 MADRS outcomes. Achieving N-back=3 during the first EFMT was also predictive of MADRS improvement at Week 6; however, achieving the difficulty threshold N-back≥5 overall was not correlated with MADRS outcomes. Importantly, no relationship was observed between sham-app memory-task performance and MADRS outcomes. Discussion & Conclusions CT-152 EFMT, but not sham-app performance, was correlated with MADRS improvements, highlighting EFMT therapeutic effects even for participants who did not achieve more difficult N-back thresholds.

The International Journal of NeuropsychopharmacologyVol. 28(Supplement_2)
Otsuka (United States) (US), Click Diagnostics (United States) (US), Precision Therapeutics (United States) (US), Otsuka Pharmaceutical (Spain) (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Digital Mental Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.