Evaluating proactivity levels in socially assistive robots for elderly care: a user adoption assessment

This study evaluates different levels of proactivity in socially assistive robots (SARs) within elderly care, focussing on user acceptance and comfort. Using the mPLiCA model, we categorise proactive behaviours from basic presence to full autonomy. A series of video scenarios was created to represent varying degrees of proactive interactions with SHARA, a socially assistive robot. Participants rated these scenarios based on usefulness, appropriateness, perceived intrusiveness and naturalness. Results indicate that higher levels of proactivity are perceived as more useful but also more intrusive. Intermediate levels, particularly dialogue-based interactions, were the most acceptable. This research offers insights into designing SARs that balance autonomy and user comfort in elderly care, contributing to the development of more effective assistive technologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behaviour and Information Technology
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929x.2025.2546976
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.44

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating proactivity levels in socially assistive robots for elderly care: a user adoption assessment

Jesús Favela, Jesús Fontecha, Luis Cabañero, Ramón Hervás et al.
1 citations
Behaviour and Information Technology
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
2.44
article

Evaluating proactivity levels in socially assistive robots for elderly care: a user adoption assessment

Jesús Favela, Jesús Fontecha, Luis Cabañero, Ramón Hervás, Gustavo López, Laura Villa
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study evaluates different levels of proactivity in socially assistive robots (SARs) within elderly care, focussing on user acceptance and comfort. Using the mPLiCA model, we categorise proactive behaviours from basic presence to full autonomy. A series of video scenarios was created to represent varying degrees of proactive interactions with SHARA, a socially assistive robot. Participants rated these scenarios based on usefulness, appropriateness, perceived intrusiveness and naturalness. Results indicate that higher levels of proactivity are perceived as more useful but also more intrusive. Intermediate levels, particularly dialogue-based interactions, were the most acceptable. This research offers insights into designing SARs that balance autonomy and user comfort in elderly care, contributing to the development of more effective assistive technologies.

Behaviour and Information Technology
Universidad de Costa Rica (CR), Centro de Investigación Científica y de Educación Superior de Ensenada (MX), University of Castilla-La Mancha (ES)
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
2.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluating proactivity levels in socially assistive robots for elderly care: a user adoption assessment — Jesús Favela, Jesús Fontecha, et al. · Behaviour and Information Technology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS