In-court identifications affect juror decisions despite being unreliable.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Law and Human Behavior
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000617
Primary Topic
Jury Decision Making Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

In-court identifications affect juror decisions despite being unreliable.

Jacqueline Katzman, Margaret Bull Kovera, Eric W. Welch
Law and Human Behavior
Jury Decision Making Processes
article

In-court identifications affect juror decisions despite being unreliable.

Jacqueline Katzman, Margaret Bull Kovera, Eric W. Welch
article en

Abstract

No abstract available for this paper.
Law and Human BehaviorVol. 49(4)
The Graduate Center, CUNY (US), City University of New York (US), John Jay College of Criminal Justice (US)
American Psychology-Law Society
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Jury Decision Making Processes
DOISourceOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

In-court identifications affect juror decisions despite being unreliable. — Jacqueline Katzman, Margaret Bull Kovera, et al. · Law and Human Behavior (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS