Neural correlates reveal separate stages of spontaneous face perception

The human brain rapidly detects faces, even in inanimate objects-a phenomenon known as face pareidolia. While this illusion reveals the automaticity of face detection, it also presents a paradox: how does the brain process stimuli that are simultaneously faces and objects? Here, we combined behavioral experiments with electroencephalography to track the temporal dynamics of face pareidolia processing. Using a large stimulus set of human faces, objects containing illusory faces, and matched control objects, we show that perception of face pareidolia is remarkably flexible and task dependent. When making spontaneous similarity judgments, participants (N = 338) perceived illusory faces as intermediate between faces and objects. However, in explicit categorization tasks (N = 22), the same stimuli were predominantly classified as objects, while rating face-likeness (N = 20) bolstered the representation of face-like features. Neural responses (N = 20) tracked this perceptual flexibility: early visual processing (90-130 ms) correlated with face-like judgments, while later activity (150-210 ms) aligned with object categorization. This temporal progression demonstrates how the brain maintains multiple levels of representation, integrating early face detection with subsequent object recognition to support flexible behavior. Our findings demonstrate that face pareidolia exemplifies the brain's capacity to resolve perceptual ambiguity through dynamic processing, with task demands determining how competing representations contribute to perception.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications Psychology
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s44271-025-00308-4
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Face Recognition and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.86
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neural correlates reveal separate stages of spontaneous face perception

Amanda K. Robinson, Jessica Taubert, Sophia M. Shatek, Adrian Herbert et al.
2 citations
Communications Psychology
Face Recognition and Perception
2.86
article

Neural correlates reveal separate stages of spontaneous face perception

Amanda K. Robinson, Jessica Taubert, Sophia M. Shatek, Adrian Herbert, Greta Stuart
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The human brain rapidly detects faces, even in inanimate objects-a phenomenon known as face pareidolia. While this illusion reveals the automaticity of face detection, it also presents a paradox: how does the brain process stimuli that are simultaneously faces and objects? Here, we combined behavioral experiments with electroencephalography to track the temporal dynamics of face pareidolia processing. Using a large stimulus set of human faces, objects containing illusory faces, and matched control objects, we show that perception of face pareidolia is remarkably flexible and task dependent. When making spontaneous similarity judgments, participants (N = 338) perceived illusory faces as intermediate between faces and objects. However, in explicit categorization tasks (N = 22), the same stimuli were predominantly classified as objects, while rating face-likeness (N = 20) bolstered the representation of face-like features. Neural responses (N = 20) tracked this perceptual flexibility: early visual processing (90-130 ms) correlated with face-like judgments, while later activity (150-210 ms) aligned with object categorization. This temporal progression demonstrates how the brain maintains multiple levels of representation, integrating early face detection with subsequent object recognition to support flexible behavior. Our findings demonstrate that face pareidolia exemplifies the brain's capacity to resolve perceptual ambiguity through dynamic processing, with task demands determining how competing representations contribute to perception.

Communications PsychologyVol. 3(1)
The University of Sydney (AU), The University of Queensland (AU), University of Oxford (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Face Recognition and Perception
2.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.