Exploring the sensing discrepancy between traffic noise level and noise perception

Traffic noise level and its perception are two intertwined concepts that affect residents' quality of life and urban development. However, previous studies have mostly focused on predicting the measured traffic noise level or analyzing the spatiotemporal patterns of noise perception. Few studies have quantitatively explored the differences between these two. In this study, we proposed a noise sensing discrepancy index (NSDI) by integrating traffic noise maps and noise complaints to quantify the divergence between subjective perceived noise and objective measured traffic noise level. Using this index, the spatial patterns of this sensing discrepancy were explored and the underlying mechanisms through which urban morphology and socioeconomic attributes modulate such divergences were revealed. The study found that people from different social backgrounds have significant differences in their tolerance for noise: people who are in a quiet environment for a long time are more sensitive to noise and may make more complaints; while areas with dense greenery have a quieter perception of noise. These findings deepen people's understanding of the discrepancy between subjective perceived traffic noise and objective measured noise level, and provide a scientific basis for optimizing urban planning and noise management strategies to reduce the impact of traffic noise.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3073192
Primary Topic
Noise Effects and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the sensing discrepancy between traffic noise level and noise perception

Jiaqi Tu, Haizhen Xian, Z. Ellen Peng, Huan Tong et al.
Noise Effects and Management
article

Exploring the sensing discrepancy between traffic noise level and noise perception

Jiaqi Tu, Haizhen Xian, Z. Ellen Peng, Huan Tong, Mingxiao Li
article en

Abstract

Traffic noise level and its perception are two intertwined concepts that affect residents' quality of life and urban development. However, previous studies have mostly focused on predicting the measured traffic noise level or analyzing the spatiotemporal patterns of noise perception. Few studies have quantitatively explored the differences between these two. In this study, we proposed a noise sensing discrepancy index (NSDI) by integrating traffic noise maps and noise complaints to quantify the divergence between subjective perceived noise and objective measured traffic noise level. Using this index, the spatial patterns of this sensing discrepancy were explored and the underlying mechanisms through which urban morphology and socioeconomic attributes modulate such divergences were revealed. The study found that people from different social backgrounds have significant differences in their tolerance for noise: people who are in a quiet environment for a long time are more sensitive to noise and may make more complaints; while areas with dense greenery have a quieter perception of noise. These findings deepen people's understanding of the discrepancy between subjective perceived traffic noise and objective measured noise level, and provide a scientific basis for optimizing urban planning and noise management strategies to reduce the impact of traffic noise.

Shenzhen University (CN), Harbin Institute of Technology (CN), Smart Material (Germany) (DE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Noise Effects and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.