Robotic versus Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Cholecystitis: Precision Meets Tradition – A Review of Surgical Techniques: A Meta-analysis

Abstract Introduction: Robotic-assisted cholecystectomy (RC) is used as a treatment for cholecystitis because it has advantages similar to laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). This study aims to compare (RC) and (LC) in many aspects to see which one would give better outcomes to the patients. Methods: A systemic literature search was conducted on 210 articles using PubMed and Web of Science as databases. Nine articles were identified after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results: The analysis showed that (RC) was superior to (LC) in multiple aspects such as total surgery time (mean difference [MD]: 4.48 [0.02, 8.95] with 95% confidence interval [CI], P = 0.05), bile spillage (odds ratio [OR]: 0.26 [0.14, 0.48] with 95% CI, P < 0.0001), length of post-operative hospital stay (MD: −1.80 [−2.76, −0.83] with 95% CI, P = 0.0003), conversion rate (OR: 0.36 [0.16, 0.81] with 95% CI, P = 0.01) and serious complication (OR: 1.09 [1.04, 1.14] with 95% CI, P < 0.0001). Other results were statistically insignificant which are biliary intervention (OR: 1.02 [0.57, 1.84] with 95% CI, P = 0.95), estimated blood loss (MD: −17.78 [−40.61, 5.05] with 95% CI, P = 0.13), 30 days readmission (OR: 0.66 [0.27, 1.61] with 95% CI, P = 0.36), analog pain scale (Visual Analogue Scale) (MD: −0.92 [−2.78, 0.94] with 95% CI, P = 0.33), post-operative complication (OR: 0.82 [0.52, 1.30] with 95% CI, P = 0.41). Conclusion: This meta-analysis suggests that robotic-assisted cholecystectomy (RC) offers advantages over LC, including shorter hospital stays, lower conversion rates and fewer complications. However, no significant differences were found in biliary intervention, blood loss and readmission rates. Limitations include cost concerns, small sample sizes and study variability. Future research should incorporate larger datasets and high-quality RCTs to strengthen the evidence comparing (RC) and (LC).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Advanced Trends in Medical Research
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/atmr.atmr_42_25
Primary Topic
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Robotic versus Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Cholecystitis: Precision Meets Tradition – A Review of Surgical Techniques: A Meta-analysis

Fahidah Alenzi, Ghaida Mohammed Alghamdi, Haneen Brnawi, Reem Fayez J Alanazi et al.
Journal of Advanced Trends in Medical Research
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
article

Robotic versus Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Cholecystitis: Precision Meets Tradition – A Review of Surgical Techniques: A Meta-analysis

Fahidah Alenzi, Ghaida Mohammed Alghamdi, Haneen Brnawi, Reem Fayez J Alanazi, Reyof Abdullah M Aljohani, Yousef Abdulhadi Alanazi, Alanoud Mansour Ayed Albalawi, Daey Ahmed G Aljahany, Reem Hamad Al-Hamithi, Lara Bandar S Shwkhan, Abdulrhman Jaber S Aljohani, Nasir Hashim M Alshareef
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Robotic-assisted cholecystectomy (RC) is used as a treatment for cholecystitis because it has advantages similar to laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). This study aims to compare (RC) and (LC) in many aspects to see which one would give better outcomes to the patients. Methods: A systemic literature search was conducted on 210 articles using PubMed and Web of Science as databases. Nine articles were identified after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results: The analysis showed that (RC) was superior to (LC) in multiple aspects such as total surgery time (mean difference [MD]: 4.48 [0.02, 8.95] with 95% confidence interval [CI], P = 0.05), bile spillage (odds ratio [OR]: 0.26 [0.14, 0.48] with 95% CI, P < 0.0001), length of post-operative hospital stay (MD: −1.80 [−2.76, −0.83] with 95% CI, P = 0.0003), conversion rate (OR: 0.36 [0.16, 0.81] with 95% CI, P = 0.01) and serious complication (OR: 1.09 [1.04, 1.14] with 95% CI, P < 0.0001). Other results were statistically insignificant which are biliary intervention (OR: 1.02 [0.57, 1.84] with 95% CI, P = 0.95), estimated blood loss (MD: −17.78 [−40.61, 5.05] with 95% CI, P = 0.13), 30 days readmission (OR: 0.66 [0.27, 1.61] with 95% CI, P = 0.36), analog pain scale (Visual Analogue Scale) (MD: −0.92 [−2.78, 0.94] with 95% CI, P = 0.33), post-operative complication (OR: 0.82 [0.52, 1.30] with 95% CI, P = 0.41). Conclusion: This meta-analysis suggests that robotic-assisted cholecystectomy (RC) offers advantages over LC, including shorter hospital stays, lower conversion rates and fewer complications. However, no significant differences were found in biliary intervention, blood loss and readmission rates. Limitations include cost concerns, small sample sizes and study variability. Future research should incorporate larger datasets and high-quality RCTs to strengthen the evidence comparing (RC) and (LC).

Journal of Advanced Trends in Medical ResearchVol. 2(2)
University of Tabuk (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.