Variability of Renal Ultrasound Measurements: How Physician Experience and Patient Position Affect Measurement Accuracy?

This study was designed to investigate the variability of renal ultrasound measurements, focusing on the impact of physician experience and patient position. <b>Background</b>: Since decreased kidney length is considered an indicator for chronic renal disease, understanding measurement repeatability and reproducibility is crucial for establishing effective diagnostic guidelines. <b>Methods</b>: Fifty healthy young adults underwent renal ultrasound scans performed by three examiners with varying levels of experience (12 years, 5 years, and 4 weeks). Renal length was measured at the level of the hilum in three patient positions: supine, lateral decubitus, and prone, using a 2-6 MHz convex probe (GE Logiq S8). <b>Results:</b> This study found that examiner experience significantly affected the results of sonographic measurements. However, the Interclass Correlation Coefficient analysis for all examiners demonstrated good reliability in most positions, with the highest values observed for the prone position. Measurements in the lateral decubitus position showed highest values, especially for the most experience examiner. The less experienced sonographers produced more variable results. <b>Conclusions:</b> Standardized patient positioning improves the accuracy and reproducibility of renal ultrasound measurements. The prone position offers a balance of reliability and practicality, especially for less experienced operators.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14165840
Primary Topic
Radiation Dose and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Variability of Renal Ultrasound Measurements: How Physician Experience and Patient Position Affect Measurement Accuracy?

Maciej Piskunowicz, Małgorzata Grzywińska, Wojciech Kosiak, Mariusz Kaszubowski et al.
1 links
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Radiation Dose and Imaging
article

Variability of Renal Ultrasound Measurements: How Physician Experience and Patient Position Affect Measurement Accuracy?

Maciej Piskunowicz, Małgorzata Grzywińska, Wojciech Kosiak, Mariusz Kaszubowski, Hanna Storoniak, Dominik Świętoń, Piotr Czarniak, Gabriela Alicja Hryniewicz, Joanna Świętoń
article en

Abstract

This study was designed to investigate the variability of renal ultrasound measurements, focusing on the impact of physician experience and patient position. <b>Background</b>: Since decreased kidney length is considered an indicator for chronic renal disease, understanding measurement repeatability and reproducibility is crucial for establishing effective diagnostic guidelines. <b>Methods</b>: Fifty healthy young adults underwent renal ultrasound scans performed by three examiners with varying levels of experience (12 years, 5 years, and 4 weeks). Renal length was measured at the level of the hilum in three patient positions: supine, lateral decubitus, and prone, using a 2-6 MHz convex probe (GE Logiq S8). <b>Results:</b> This study found that examiner experience significantly affected the results of sonographic measurements. However, the Interclass Correlation Coefficient analysis for all examiners demonstrated good reliability in most positions, with the highest values observed for the prone position. Measurements in the lateral decubitus position showed highest values, especially for the most experience examiner. The less experienced sonographers produced more variable results. <b>Conclusions:</b> Standardized patient positioning improves the accuracy and reproducibility of renal ultrasound measurements. The prone position offers a balance of reliability and practicality, especially for less experienced operators.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(16)
Gdańsk University of Technology (PL), University of Gdańsk (PL), Gdańsk Medical University (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Radiation Dose and Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.