China’s Health Diplomacy and Soft Power Play in Chile and Argentina: A Cross-Country Comparison

China's growing influence in Latin America has drawn increasing attention in academia. Past research has focused on trade and investment, this study examines China’s health diplomacy during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Using a comparative case study approach, it contrasts the responses of Chile and Argentina to Chinese health outreach. Despite receiving similar support, Chile has generally welcomed Chinese assistance, while Argentina has experienced anti-China protests and skepticism regarding Chinese vaccines. The study seeks to advance the understanding of soft power by exploring its relationship to domestic politics. Through semi-structured interviews with key healthcare professionals, including former Ministers of Health, the research highlights that the political environment in recipient countries significantly shapes the success of soft power initiatives. The findings suggest that when citizens perceive their leaders to prioritize personal interests over national welfare, they may be less receptive to foreign influence, offering new perspectives for global health diplomacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33774/apsa-2025-pgkhj
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.76

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

China’s Health Diplomacy and Soft Power Play in Chile and Argentina: A Cross-Country Comparison

H.K.T. Tsang
1 citations
Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
2.76
article

China’s Health Diplomacy and Soft Power Play in Chile and Argentina: A Cross-Country Comparison

H.K.T. Tsang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

China's growing influence in Latin America has drawn increasing attention in academia. Past research has focused on trade and investment, this study examines China’s health diplomacy during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Using a comparative case study approach, it contrasts the responses of Chile and Argentina to Chinese health outreach. Despite receiving similar support, Chile has generally welcomed Chinese assistance, while Argentina has experienced anti-China protests and skepticism regarding Chinese vaccines. The study seeks to advance the understanding of soft power by exploring its relationship to domestic politics. Through semi-structured interviews with key healthcare professionals, including former Ministers of Health, the research highlights that the political environment in recipient countries significantly shapes the success of soft power initiatives. The findings suggest that when citizens perceive their leaders to prioritize personal interests over national welfare, they may be less receptive to foreign influence, offering new perspectives for global health diplomacy.

British Academy (GB)
American Political Science Association
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
2.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.