A Dual-Level Model of AI Readiness in the Public Sector: Merging Organizational and Individual Factors Using TOE and UTAUT

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly transforming the public sector, although the willingness of organizations to adopt such technologies varies widely. Existing models, such as the technology–organization–environment (TOE) model, highlight systemic drivers and barriers but overlook the individual-level factors that are also critical to successful adoption. To address this gap, we propose a decision model that combines the TOE model with the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) and combines the dimensions of technology, organization, environment, and individual readiness. The model was developed using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and supports group decision-making by combining the pairwise comparison matrices of multiple experts into a consolidated priority structure. Specifically, many expert judgments were used to create a group matrix for the four main categories and four additional group matrices for the criteria within each category. This structured approach allows for a systematic assessment of whether a public sector organization is ready for AI adoption. The results show the importance of both systemic factors (such as data, technology, innovation, and readiness for change) and individual factors (such as social influence and voluntariness of use). The final model provides a comprehensive and practical decision-making tool for public sector organizations to assess readiness, identify gaps, and guide the strategic adoption of AI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Systems
Published
2025-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13080705
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Big Data and Business Intelligence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.70

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Dual-Level Model of AI Readiness in the Public Sector: Merging Organizational and Individual Factors Using TOE and UTAUT

Primož Pevcin, Katja Debelak, Rok Hržica
6 citations
Systems
Big Data and Business Intelligence
13.70
article

A Dual-Level Model of AI Readiness in the Public Sector: Merging Organizational and Individual Factors Using TOE and UTAUT

Primož Pevcin, Katja Debelak, Rok Hržica
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly transforming the public sector, although the willingness of organizations to adopt such technologies varies widely. Existing models, such as the technology–organization–environment (TOE) model, highlight systemic drivers and barriers but overlook the individual-level factors that are also critical to successful adoption. To address this gap, we propose a decision model that combines the TOE model with the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) and combines the dimensions of technology, organization, environment, and individual readiness. The model was developed using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and supports group decision-making by combining the pairwise comparison matrices of multiple experts into a consolidated priority structure. Specifically, many expert judgments were used to create a group matrix for the four main categories and four additional group matrices for the criteria within each category. This structured approach allows for a systematic assessment of whether a public sector organization is ready for AI adoption. The results show the importance of both systemic factors (such as data, technology, innovation, and readiness for change) and individual factors (such as social influence and voluntariness of use). The final model provides a comprehensive and practical decision-making tool for public sector organizations to assess readiness, identify gaps, and guide the strategic adoption of AI.

SystemsVol. 13(8)
University of Ljubljana (SI)
Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Big Data and Business Intelligence
13.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.