Post anaesthesia cognitive outcomes in propofol vs. ketamine sedation for colonoscopy: a retrospective cohort study

Abstract Purpose Colorectal cancer is the third most common malignancy worldwide and the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality. Colonoscopy, the primary screening method for this disease, typically involves sedation to enhance patient comfort and ensure a thorough examination. The choice of sedative is particularly important for older adults, as sedation can have implications on cognitive function. This study aims to evaluate the long-term cognitive effects of propofol and ketamine by examining the risk of developing dementia, disorientation, and depression following colonoscopy. Methods Utilizing data from the TriNetX platform, we compared two cohorts of patients who had undergone a colonoscopy and received either exclusively propofol ( n = 1,938) or ketamine ( n = 1,938) for sedation. Measures of association and survival were analyzed using TriNetX. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated from logistic regression to compare the cohorts. Survival analysis was conducted using the Cox proportional hazards model to find hazard ratio (HR). Results One of the most notable findings was the association between ketamine use and an increased risk of disorientation, with an odds ratio of 0.489 and a hazard ratio of 0.443 for propofol compared to ketamine. Regarding dementia, the lower OR (0.603) and HR (0.561) associated with propofol suggest that it may have a comparatively safer profile concerning long-term memory and cognitive decline. The findings also demonstrated a significant difference in depression rates, with propofol showing reduced odds (0.740) and risk ratios (0.688) of postprocedural depression compared to ketamine. Conclusion These findings suggest that propofol may offer a safer cognitive profile than ketamine, particularly for older patients and those at risk of cognitive decline. Given the increasing number of older adults undergoing colonoscopy, these results highlight the importance of selecting sedative agents that balance immediate procedural needs with long-term cognitive health.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Anesthesiology and Perioperative Science
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44254-025-00125-2
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Post anaesthesia cognitive outcomes in propofol vs. ketamine sedation for colonoscopy: a retrospective cohort study

Shu Chien, Eduardo D Espiridion, Ashley Deng, Zachary Zook
Anesthesiology and Perioperative Science
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
article

Post anaesthesia cognitive outcomes in propofol vs. ketamine sedation for colonoscopy: a retrospective cohort study

Shu Chien, Eduardo D Espiridion, Ashley Deng, Zachary Zook
article en

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Colorectal cancer is the third most common malignancy worldwide and the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality. Colonoscopy, the primary screening method for this disease, typically involves sedation to enhance patient comfort and ensure a thorough examination. The choice of sedative is particularly important for older adults, as sedation can have implications on cognitive function. This study aims to evaluate the long-term cognitive effects of propofol and ketamine by examining the risk of developing dementia, disorientation, and depression following colonoscopy. Methods Utilizing data from the TriNetX platform, we compared two cohorts of patients who had undergone a colonoscopy and received either exclusively propofol ( n = 1,938) or ketamine ( n = 1,938) for sedation. Measures of association and survival were analyzed using TriNetX. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated from logistic regression to compare the cohorts. Survival analysis was conducted using the Cox proportional hazards model to find hazard ratio (HR). Results One of the most notable findings was the association between ketamine use and an increased risk of disorientation, with an odds ratio of 0.489 and a hazard ratio of 0.443 for propofol compared to ketamine. Regarding dementia, the lower OR (0.603) and HR (0.561) associated with propofol suggest that it may have a comparatively safer profile concerning long-term memory and cognitive decline. The findings also demonstrated a significant difference in depression rates, with propofol showing reduced odds (0.740) and risk ratios (0.688) of postprocedural depression compared to ketamine. Conclusion These findings suggest that propofol may offer a safer cognitive profile than ketamine, particularly for older patients and those at risk of cognitive decline. Given the increasing number of older adults undergoing colonoscopy, these results highlight the importance of selecting sedative agents that balance immediate procedural needs with long-term cognitive health.

Anesthesiology and Perioperative ScienceVol. 3(3)
Reading Hospital (US), Drexel University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.