Outcome measurement for vascular amputee patients: a scoping survey of UK clinical practice

Objective: Currently it is unknown whether Physical Performance Based Outcome Measures (PerBOMs) are used in clinical practice with patients who have undergone an amputation due to peripheral arterial disease. This study aims to explore the clinical use and usefulness for healthcare professionals (HCPs) and to look at the types of rehabilitation interventions being provided to amputees. Methods: An anonymised scoping survey published online at https://www.onlinesurveys.ac.uk was used. The survey consisted of 17 questions, and all data collected were non-identifiable. Ethical approval was obtained from the University of Leicester ethics committee. Statistical analysis was completed with descriptive statistics. Results: A total of 125 HCPs responded, of which more than half had ≥10 years’ experience working with vascular amputees (51.2%). Timed Up and Go was the most used ambulatory PerBOM by HCPs (89%) and the Basic Ambulatory Mobility Scale (45%) was the most commonly used non-ambulatory PerBOM. PerBOMs were least used before amputation (15%) and were used most frequently 6 months after amputation (59%). HCPs rated PerBOMs for ambulatory patients as being of greater usefulness than non-ambulatory PerBOMs. The most common rehabilitation interventions for non-ambulatory amputees include transfer practice (85.5%) and wheelchair training (69.6%); few provided group exercise therapy (23.2%). Conclusions: Ambulatory PerBOMs are well known and used more frequently than non-ambulatory PerBOMs. PerBOMs for vascular amputees are not used within clinical practice due to the limited number and inadequate options of PerBOMs for non-ambulatory vascular amputees. Further research is needed in understanding the limited clinical use of existing PerBOMs. Pending further research, a new PerBOM for non-ambulatory patients may be supported to assess the physical function of amputees throughout the patient journey of vascular amputees and for goal setting in the short and longer term.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vascular Societies Great Britain and Ireland
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54522/jvsgbi.2025.188
Primary Topic
Peripheral Artery Disease Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Outcome measurement for vascular amputee patients: a scoping survey of UK clinical practice

Anna Meffen, Amirah Essop-Adam, SJ Singh, VJ Haunton et al.
Journal of Vascular Societies Great Britain and Ireland
Peripheral Artery Disease Management
article

Outcome measurement for vascular amputee patients: a scoping survey of UK clinical practice

Anna Meffen, Amirah Essop-Adam, SJ Singh, VJ Haunton, RD Sayers
article en

Abstract

Objective: Currently it is unknown whether Physical Performance Based Outcome Measures (PerBOMs) are used in clinical practice with patients who have undergone an amputation due to peripheral arterial disease. This study aims to explore the clinical use and usefulness for healthcare professionals (HCPs) and to look at the types of rehabilitation interventions being provided to amputees. Methods: An anonymised scoping survey published online at https://www.onlinesurveys.ac.uk was used. The survey consisted of 17 questions, and all data collected were non-identifiable. Ethical approval was obtained from the University of Leicester ethics committee. Statistical analysis was completed with descriptive statistics. Results: A total of 125 HCPs responded, of which more than half had ≥10 years’ experience working with vascular amputees (51.2%). Timed Up and Go was the most used ambulatory PerBOM by HCPs (89%) and the Basic Ambulatory Mobility Scale (45%) was the most commonly used non-ambulatory PerBOM. PerBOMs were least used before amputation (15%) and were used most frequently 6 months after amputation (59%). HCPs rated PerBOMs for ambulatory patients as being of greater usefulness than non-ambulatory PerBOMs. The most common rehabilitation interventions for non-ambulatory amputees include transfer practice (85.5%) and wheelchair training (69.6%); few provided group exercise therapy (23.2%). Conclusions: Ambulatory PerBOMs are well known and used more frequently than non-ambulatory PerBOMs. PerBOMs for vascular amputees are not used within clinical practice due to the limited number and inadequate options of PerBOMs for non-ambulatory vascular amputees. Further research is needed in understanding the limited clinical use of existing PerBOMs. Pending further research, a new PerBOM for non-ambulatory patients may be supported to assess the physical function of amputees throughout the patient journey of vascular amputees and for goal setting in the short and longer term.

Journal of Vascular Societies Great Britain and IrelandVol. 4(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Peripheral Artery Disease Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Outcome measurement for vascular amputee patients: a scoping survey of UK clinical practice — Anna Meffen, Amirah Essop-Adam, et al. · Journal of Vascular Societies Great Britain and Ireland (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS