X-HAZOP: A Family of Techniques for Ethical Hazard Analysis of Assistive Robots

Determining the ethical acceptability of assistive robots is a complex task, not least because the ethical hazards of such systems manifest differently across different demographics. Users of these robots are potentially likely to be already marginalized by technology and, thus, vulnerable to a wider range of ethical hazards than other demographics. Adequate assessment and mitigation of the robot’s ethical hazards therefore requires creativity, collaboration, and a range of diverse perspectives. This article presents X-hazard and operability analysis (X-HAZOP), a family, or toolbox, of techniques for conducting ethical hazard analysis of an assistive robot by utilizing structured facilitated workshops. We present the findings from multiple workshops, demonstrating that the use of X-HAZOP techniques with a suitably diverse group of participants improves creation of accessible descriptions of the robot, aids understanding, and leads to an effective identification of a range of ethical hazards.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/mra.2025.3590612
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

X-HAZOP: A Family of Techniques for Ethical Hazard Analysis of Assistive Robots

Gabriella Lakatos, Sílvia Moros, Patrick Holthaus, Austen Rainer et al.
IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

X-HAZOP: A Family of Techniques for Ethical Hazard Analysis of Assistive Robots

Gabriella Lakatos, Sílvia Moros, Patrick Holthaus, Austen Rainer, Catherine Menon
article en

Abstract

Determining the ethical acceptability of assistive robots is a complex task, not least because the ethical hazards of such systems manifest differently across different demographics. Users of these robots are potentially likely to be already marginalized by technology and, thus, vulnerable to a wider range of ethical hazards than other demographics. Adequate assessment and mitigation of the robot’s ethical hazards therefore requires creativity, collaboration, and a range of diverse perspectives. This article presents X-hazard and operability analysis (X-HAZOP), a family, or toolbox, of techniques for conducting ethical hazard analysis of an assistive robot by utilizing structured facilitated workshops. We present the findings from multiple workshops, demonstrating that the use of X-HAZOP techniques with a suitably diverse group of participants improves creation of accessible descriptions of the robot, aids understanding, and leads to an effective identification of a range of ethical hazards.

IEEE Robotics & Automation MagazineVol. 32(4)
Queen's University Belfast (GB), University of Hertfordshire (GB)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

X-HAZOP: A Family of Techniques for Ethical Hazard Analysis of Assistive Robots — Gabriella Lakatos, Sílvia Moros, et al. · IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS