Detecting And Mitigating Incoherent Input Of Latent Diffusion Models

Incoherent input is a common source of undesirable output of Latent Diffusion Models. We propose an approach for detecting and mitigating such inputs. For prompt incoherences, we analyze key categories for conflicting descriptions. We mitigate conflicts using a graph-based approach, minimizing the required modifications. Image incoherences are detected by assessing if a global or local style is present. Regions with no distinct style are discarded and replaced with a text prompt describing the image content. We evaluate the framework on over 11,000 images generated with Stable Diffusion XL using the PartiPrompts and StyleBench datasets. The framework detects 91% of all incoherences. For text input, the aesthetic score increased by up to 1.5% and the CLIP score by 4.7%. For image input, the aesthetic score improved by up to 10.1% and the CLIP score by 9.1%. In two validation surveys with 106 participants, the output of the proposed framework was preferred for 86% of the images.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icip55913.2025.11084610
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Detecting And Mitigating Incoherent Input Of Latent Diffusion Models

Tamay Aykut, Boğaç Ünver, Christopher B. Kuhn, Christoph Burgmair et al.
Topic Modeling
article

Detecting And Mitigating Incoherent Input Of Latent Diffusion Models

Tamay Aykut, Boğaç Ünver, Christopher B. Kuhn, Christoph Burgmair, Diego Vera
article en

Abstract

Incoherent input is a common source of undesirable output of Latent Diffusion Models. We propose an approach for detecting and mitigating such inputs. For prompt incoherences, we analyze key categories for conflicting descriptions. We mitigate conflicts using a graph-based approach, minimizing the required modifications. Image incoherences are detected by assessing if a global or local style is present. Regions with no distinct style are discarded and replaced with a text prompt describing the image content. We evaluate the framework on over 11,000 images generated with Stable Diffusion XL using the PartiPrompts and StyleBench datasets. The framework detects 91% of all incoherences. For text input, the aesthetic score increased by up to 1.5% and the CLIP score by 4.7%. For image input, the aesthetic score improved by up to 10.1% and the CLIP score by 9.1%. In two validation surveys with 106 participants, the output of the proposed framework was preferred for 86% of the images.

Pacific Environment (US), Technical University of Munich (DE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Topic Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Detecting And Mitigating Incoherent Input Of Latent Diffusion Models — Tamay Aykut, Boğaç Ünver, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS