Bayesian Surprise for Small and Sub-Pixel Moving Target Detection

Detecting very small moving targets (sub-pixel to a few pixels) has not benefited much from recent advances in deep neural networks, as these typically rely on texture features that are absent in very small targets. We present a new algorithm using Bayesian surprise. It computes how an artificial observer’s beliefs about the contents of a video sequence evolve over space and time. Surprise builds a distribution of beliefs for each pixel in the video. On every new video frame, Bayes’ theorem updates the prior belief distributions into posterior distributions. Surprise arises when/where these updates are significant, as measured by the Kullback-Leibler divergence. Surprise outperforms 27 baselines on downscaled versions of the public Neovision2-Tower dataset (50 videos, 45,000 frames total, 5 target types). Notably, surprise is more robust to wide-area perturbations (e.g., foliage fluttering in the wind, clouds passing by) than other pixel-level models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icip55913.2025.11084756
Primary Topic
Infrared Target Detection Methodologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bayesian Surprise for Small and Sub-Pixel Moving Target Detection

Corinne Teeter, Srideep Musuvathy, L. Itti, Daben Liu
Infrared Target Detection Methodologies
article

Bayesian Surprise for Small and Sub-Pixel Moving Target Detection

Corinne Teeter, Srideep Musuvathy, L. Itti, Daben Liu
article en

Abstract

Detecting very small moving targets (sub-pixel to a few pixels) has not benefited much from recent advances in deep neural networks, as these typically rely on texture features that are absent in very small targets. We present a new algorithm using Bayesian surprise. It computes how an artificial observer’s beliefs about the contents of a video sequence evolve over space and time. Surprise builds a distribution of beliefs for each pixel in the video. On every new video frame, Bayes’ theorem updates the prior belief distributions into posterior distributions. Surprise arises when/where these updates are significant, as measured by the Kullback-Leibler divergence. Surprise outperforms 27 baselines on downscaled versions of the public Neovision2-Tower dataset (50 videos, 45,000 frames total, 5 target types). Notably, surprise is more robust to wide-area perturbations (e.g., foliage fluttering in the wind, clouds passing by) than other pixel-level models.

University of Southern California (US), California Southern University (US), Sandia National Laboratories (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Infrared Target Detection Methodologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Bayesian Surprise for Small and Sub-Pixel Moving Target Detection — Corinne Teeter, Srideep Musuvathy, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS