Comparison of Annular Surface Dielectric Barrier Discharge Characteristics Under AC and Nanosecond Pulsed Excitation

To explore the discharge characteristics of annular surface dielectric barrier discharge (SDBD) and guide the optimization of plasma excitation sources, this study presents a comparative analysis of SDBD behavior driven by a high-frequency, high-voltage alternating current (ac) power supply and a nanosecond pulsed power supply. The voltage–current waveforms and discharge images were employed to systematically investigate the differences in discharge initiation, spatial morphology, and temporal evolution under the two excitation modes. The results show that nanosecond-pulsed SDBD exhibits reverse discharge during the voltage fall phase, whereas ac-driven SDBD exhibits an earlier discharge onset due to cumulative surface charge effects. As the voltage amplitude increases, both excitation modes produce more streamer channels and broader discharge areas. However, their discharge distribution modes differ significantly. Annular SDBD under ac excitation produces filamentary discharge localized along the edge of the high-voltage electrode, whereas under nanosecond pulse excitation, the separated-channel discharge channels are produced. These differences are attributed to variations in voltage rise time and surface charge dynamics. Nanosecond pulses create a stronger transient electric field, expanding discharge coverage. In ac-SDBD, residual electrons near the high-voltage electrode promote early breakdown in the next cycle. In contrast, reverse discharge under pulsed excitation reduces residual positive charge and delays the next discharge. Nevertheless, the high conductivity of established channels promotes repeated breakdown in the same location, maintaining separated-channel distribution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tps.2025.3597132
Primary Topic
Plasma Applications and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Annular Surface Dielectric Barrier Discharge Characteristics Under AC and Nanosecond Pulsed Excitation

Ziyi Gong, Hui Jiang, Yufei Han, Jiayu Li et al.
IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science
Plasma Applications and Diagnostics
article

Comparison of Annular Surface Dielectric Barrier Discharge Characteristics Under AC and Nanosecond Pulsed Excitation

Ziyi Gong, Hui Jiang, Yufei Han, Jiayu Li, Jinyu Tang, Yunlong Gao
article en

Abstract

To explore the discharge characteristics of annular surface dielectric barrier discharge (SDBD) and guide the optimization of plasma excitation sources, this study presents a comparative analysis of SDBD behavior driven by a high-frequency, high-voltage alternating current (ac) power supply and a nanosecond pulsed power supply. The voltage–current waveforms and discharge images were employed to systematically investigate the differences in discharge initiation, spatial morphology, and temporal evolution under the two excitation modes. The results show that nanosecond-pulsed SDBD exhibits reverse discharge during the voltage fall phase, whereas ac-driven SDBD exhibits an earlier discharge onset due to cumulative surface charge effects. As the voltage amplitude increases, both excitation modes produce more streamer channels and broader discharge areas. However, their discharge distribution modes differ significantly. Annular SDBD under ac excitation produces filamentary discharge localized along the edge of the high-voltage electrode, whereas under nanosecond pulse excitation, the separated-channel discharge channels are produced. These differences are attributed to variations in voltage rise time and surface charge dynamics. Nanosecond pulses create a stronger transient electric field, expanding discharge coverage. In ac-SDBD, residual electrons near the high-voltage electrode promote early breakdown in the next cycle. In contrast, reverse discharge under pulsed excitation reduces residual positive charge and delays the next discharge. Nevertheless, the high conductivity of established channels promotes repeated breakdown in the same location, maintaining separated-channel distribution.

IEEE Transactions on Plasma ScienceVol. 53(9)
Chongqing University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Plasma Applications and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.