Effect of random item ordering in multiple choice tests on the academic achievement of online learners

This study examined the effect of randomly ordered multiple-choice test forms on students' academic achievement. This study was carried out with a true experimental design. All students participating in the study received their training through online learning. The study group of the research consists of 2932 freshman university students studying at different faculties of a state university in the Fall Semester of the 2023-2024 academic year. A 20-item multiple-choice test was used to measure the student's academic achievement. Four different test forms were generated by randomly ordering the items. One-way ANOVA was used to test whether there was a significant difference between the mean scores of the students who took different test forms. Additionally, test statistics of different test forms were examined. The findings showed no significant difference between the students' mean scores in different test forms (1) and that the score distributions were balanced (2). These findings indicate that the different test forms generated by random ordering are equivalent. The similarity of the test statistics of the different test forms also supports these findings. As a result of this study, different test forms were created through random ordering do not affect students' academic achievements. This study suggests educators, test developers, and administrators create different test forms through randomization as a cheating prevention method in multiple-choice tests.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ODÜ Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi (ODÜSOBİAD)
Published
2025-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48146/odusobiad.1599977
Primary Topic
Online and Blended Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of random item ordering in multiple choice tests on the academic achievement of online learners

Bülent Kandemir, Necati Taşkın
ODÜ Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi (ODÜSOBİAD)
Online and Blended Learning
article

Effect of random item ordering in multiple choice tests on the academic achievement of online learners

Bülent Kandemir, Necati Taşkın
article en

Abstract

This study examined the effect of randomly ordered multiple-choice test forms on students' academic achievement. This study was carried out with a true experimental design. All students participating in the study received their training through online learning. The study group of the research consists of 2932 freshman university students studying at different faculties of a state university in the Fall Semester of the 2023-2024 academic year. A 20-item multiple-choice test was used to measure the student's academic achievement. Four different test forms were generated by randomly ordering the items. One-way ANOVA was used to test whether there was a significant difference between the mean scores of the students who took different test forms. Additionally, test statistics of different test forms were examined. The findings showed no significant difference between the students' mean scores in different test forms (1) and that the score distributions were balanced (2). These findings indicate that the different test forms generated by random ordering are equivalent. The similarity of the test statistics of the different test forms also supports these findings. As a result of this study, different test forms were created through random ordering do not affect students' academic achievements. This study suggests educators, test developers, and administrators create different test forms through randomization as a cheating prevention method in multiple-choice tests.

ODÜ Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi (ODÜSOBİAD)Vol. 15(2)
Ordu University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Online and Blended Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.