A compactor-soil coupling model considering mechanical inertia and its delayed feedback active suspension control

Compactors have been widely employed in civil engineering projects, including pavement construction, railway embankments, and dam foundations. To investigate compactor-soil interaction dynamics, researchers have developed numerous dynamic models to optimize compaction efficiency. Traditional modeling approaches typically neglected the mechanical inertia of compactor suspension systems for simplification purposes. However, this simplification underestimates the filtering effect of suspension mass on vibration excitation, resulting in compromised phase delay characterization and high-frequency dynamic response prediction. These limitations adversely affect both control strategy effectiveness and model prediction accuracy. To overcome these limitations, this study develops an innovative compactor-soil coupling model incorporating mechanical inertia to more accurately simulate compactor dynamics. The research systematically examines the dynamic differences introduced by inertia consideration. The results reveal that mechanical inertia significantly prolongs the transient response time—the steady-state times of the frame and drum increase from 8.03 s and 4.57 s to 55.78 s and 27.06 s, respectively. Under conditions of high soil plasticity, the response times of the frame and roller reach 63.58 s and 23.75 s, respectively. Consequently, delayed feedback active suspension control is implemented to effectively suppress system oscillations, reducing the steady-state times to 14.31 s (frame) and 7.67 s (drum) using a displacement gain equal to three times the frame stiffness. Comparative analyses demonstrate the superior adaptability of the proposed coupling model in characterizing compactor dynamic responses. This advanced model not only provides practical solutions for enhancing vibration isolation and compaction quality but also establishes a theoretical foundation for developing next-generation intelligent compaction systems. • A new compactor-soil coupling model was proposed. • Influence of the mechanical inertia of the suspension on the dynamic response of the compactor was considered. • Differences between the new model and the model that does not consider mechanical inertia were compared. • Effect of delayed feedback active suspension control on the dynamic response was investigated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2025.105245
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Soil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.63

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A compactor-soil coupling model considering mechanical inertia and its delayed feedback active suspension control

Dong Feng
8 citations
International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics
Soil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics
7.63
article

A compactor-soil coupling model considering mechanical inertia and its delayed feedback active suspension control

Dong Feng
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Compactors have been widely employed in civil engineering projects, including pavement construction, railway embankments, and dam foundations. To investigate compactor-soil interaction dynamics, researchers have developed numerous dynamic models to optimize compaction efficiency. Traditional modeling approaches typically neglected the mechanical inertia of compactor suspension systems for simplification purposes. However, this simplification underestimates the filtering effect of suspension mass on vibration excitation, resulting in compromised phase delay characterization and high-frequency dynamic response prediction. These limitations adversely affect both control strategy effectiveness and model prediction accuracy. To overcome these limitations, this study develops an innovative compactor-soil coupling model incorporating mechanical inertia to more accurately simulate compactor dynamics. The research systematically examines the dynamic differences introduced by inertia consideration. The results reveal that mechanical inertia significantly prolongs the transient response time—the steady-state times of the frame and drum increase from 8.03 s and 4.57 s to 55.78 s and 27.06 s, respectively. Under conditions of high soil plasticity, the response times of the frame and roller reach 63.58 s and 23.75 s, respectively. Consequently, delayed feedback active suspension control is implemented to effectively suppress system oscillations, reducing the steady-state times to 14.31 s (frame) and 7.67 s (drum) using a displacement gain equal to three times the frame stiffness. Comparative analyses demonstrate the superior adaptability of the proposed coupling model in characterizing compactor dynamic responses. This advanced model not only provides practical solutions for enhancing vibration isolation and compaction quality but also establishes a theoretical foundation for developing next-generation intelligent compaction systems. • A new compactor-soil coupling model was proposed. • Influence of the mechanical inertia of the suspension on the dynamic response of the compactor was considered. • Differences between the new model and the model that does not consider mechanical inertia were compared. • Effect of delayed feedback active suspension control on the dynamic response was investigated.

International Journal of Non-Linear MechanicsVol. 179
RWTH Aachen University (DE)
China Scholarship Council
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Soil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics
7.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.