Standardized nomenclature for photovoltaic connectors

• Improper assembly and installation of PV connectors is a major reliability issue. • An industry survey found no common nomenclature for connector components. • Clear definitions of terms like “cross-mating” and “positive/negative” are crucial. • Replace “MC4 compatible” with “4 mm PV connector” to reduce confusion. • A standardized connector terminology helps prevent mistakes and miscommunication. Photovoltaic (PV) systems rely on discrete connectors for the efficient and safe flow of power from module to module and from strings to combiner boxes and inverters. Despite their functional importance, no common nomenclature for PV connectors currently exists, resulting in confusion and miscommunication. Misunderstood terms like “MC4 compatible”, “cross-mating”, “intermating”, “female”, and “male” can lead to installation and maintenance errors and compromise system reliability. We believe a standardized terminology will reduce confusion, help support installation best practices, aid in maintenance and repair, inform next-generation designs, and provide a technical basis for improved codes and standards. To that end, we are proposing a standardized glossary for 4 mm PV connectors (the most common type of connector used in PV applications) based on, and validated by, a Sandia National Laboratories’ investigation that included the following sources: 1) a comprehensive review of official documents from 20 connector manufacturers, including schematics, datasheets, installation manuals, and catalogs, as well as relevant patents; 2) two rounds of surveys distributed to stakeholders, including connector manufacturers, engineers, asset owners, test labs, and researchers; and 3) visual examination of 25 different models of 4 mm single-pole DC PV connectors to document variations in design and functionality. This work provides a foundation for establishing a clear and consistent terminology for PV connectors that will in turn enable progress toward greater reliability and collaboration across the industry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Solar Energy
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2025.113847
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Electrical Contact Performance and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Standardized nomenclature for photovoltaic connectors

David C. Miller, Steven DiGregorio, Laurie Burnham, Bill Sekulic et al.
4 citations
Solar Energy
Electrical Contact Performance and Analysis
2.85
article

Standardized nomenclature for photovoltaic connectors

David C. Miller, Steven DiGregorio, Laurie Burnham, Bill Sekulic, Bruce H. King, David Penalva Aguilar
article en
4 citations

Abstract

• Improper assembly and installation of PV connectors is a major reliability issue. • An industry survey found no common nomenclature for connector components. • Clear definitions of terms like “cross-mating” and “positive/negative” are crucial. • Replace “MC4 compatible” with “4 mm PV connector” to reduce confusion. • A standardized connector terminology helps prevent mistakes and miscommunication. Photovoltaic (PV) systems rely on discrete connectors for the efficient and safe flow of power from module to module and from strings to combiner boxes and inverters. Despite their functional importance, no common nomenclature for PV connectors currently exists, resulting in confusion and miscommunication. Misunderstood terms like “MC4 compatible”, “cross-mating”, “intermating”, “female”, and “male” can lead to installation and maintenance errors and compromise system reliability. We believe a standardized terminology will reduce confusion, help support installation best practices, aid in maintenance and repair, inform next-generation designs, and provide a technical basis for improved codes and standards. To that end, we are proposing a standardized glossary for 4 mm PV connectors (the most common type of connector used in PV applications) based on, and validated by, a Sandia National Laboratories’ investigation that included the following sources: 1) a comprehensive review of official documents from 20 connector manufacturers, including schematics, datasheets, installation manuals, and catalogs, as well as relevant patents; 2) two rounds of surveys distributed to stakeholders, including connector manufacturers, engineers, asset owners, test labs, and researchers; and 3) visual examination of 25 different models of 4 mm single-pole DC PV connectors to document variations in design and functionality. This work provides a foundation for establishing a clear and consistent terminology for PV connectors that will in turn enable progress toward greater reliability and collaboration across the industry.

Solar EnergyVol. 300
National Laboratory of the Rockies (US), Sandia National Laboratories (US), Structural Analytics (United States) (US)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Electrical Contact Performance and Analysis
2.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.