Power-to-methanol: Techno-economic analysis of a regional, decentral case-study

• CO 2 hydrogenation combined with water electrolysis is simulated in Aspen Plus. • In-depth Techno-Economic Assessment is performed on different sustainable scenarios. • Levelized cost of sustainable MeOH is compared fossil-based scenarios. • Currently, sustainable processes are economically not feasible, due to LCoH of LCoE. • Future trends show predictive changes in levelized cost of sustainable MeOH. This study investigates the decentral Power-to-Methanol economics for the situation in The Netherlands. Power-to-X processes are seen as a promising technology for balancing the energy market and enabling fossil-free pathways within the chemical industry. However, within literature there is a lot of variation in the levelized cost of methanol per production. The research presented in this paper consists of three steps, starting with an ASPEN Plus® simulation of different scenarios, followed by calculations of capital investment (CAPEX) and operational & maintenance costs (OPEX), finally resulting in the levelized cost of methanol. Results show that the operational cost greatly exceeds the capital costs, due to the high contributions of either H 2 as raw material or sustainable electricity if H 2 is produced on site. Levelized cost of sustainable methanol is calculated between 4,059 and 4,510 € /ton MeOH. This is twice as high compared to methanol generated with the same process using grey H 2 (2,244 € /ton MeOH) and a factor 6 more expensive compared to bulk MeOH from fossil industry (700 € /ton MeOH). Future trends in costs show that for decentral production, grey and sustainable MeOH can have a similar order of magnitude by 2050.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fuel
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2025.136528
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.19

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Power-to-methanol: Techno-economic analysis of a regional, decentral case-study

Hossein Nami, Richard van Leeuwen, Yashar S. Hajimolana, Wim de Jong et al.
6 citations
Fuel
Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
3.19
article

Power-to-methanol: Techno-economic analysis of a regional, decentral case-study

Hossein Nami, Richard van Leeuwen, Yashar S. Hajimolana, Wim de Jong, Hans Gelten, Bert Heesink, Benno Aalderink
article en
6 citations

Abstract

• CO 2 hydrogenation combined with water electrolysis is simulated in Aspen Plus. • In-depth Techno-Economic Assessment is performed on different sustainable scenarios. • Levelized cost of sustainable MeOH is compared fossil-based scenarios. • Currently, sustainable processes are economically not feasible, due to LCoH of LCoE. • Future trends show predictive changes in levelized cost of sustainable MeOH. This study investigates the decentral Power-to-Methanol economics for the situation in The Netherlands. Power-to-X processes are seen as a promising technology for balancing the energy market and enabling fossil-free pathways within the chemical industry. However, within literature there is a lot of variation in the levelized cost of methanol per production. The research presented in this paper consists of three steps, starting with an ASPEN Plus® simulation of different scenarios, followed by calculations of capital investment (CAPEX) and operational & maintenance costs (OPEX), finally resulting in the levelized cost of methanol. Results show that the operational cost greatly exceeds the capital costs, due to the high contributions of either H 2 as raw material or sustainable electricity if H 2 is produced on site. Levelized cost of sustainable methanol is calculated between 4,059 and 4,510 € /ton MeOH. This is twice as high compared to methanol generated with the same process using grey H 2 (2,244 € /ton MeOH) and a factor 6 more expensive compared to bulk MeOH from fossil industry (700 € /ton MeOH). Future trends in costs show that for decentral production, grey and sustainable MeOH can have a similar order of magnitude by 2050.

FuelVol. 405
University of Southern Denmark (DK), Saxion (NL), Ziekenhuis Groep Twente (NL), Novay (NL), University of Twente (NL)
European Commission, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme, Nationaal Regieorgaan Praktijkgericht Onderzoek SIA
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
3.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.