Analysis of process data to advance digital-based multilingual assessments

Unlike traditional large-scale assessments, digital-based assessments collect process data that provide information about test-takers' actions in the assessment platform while solving test items, e.g., response and reaction times, number of clicks, and skipping. In multilingual digital-based assessments, the comparability of test scores across different assessment languages is essential and challenges assessment design principles regarding fairness. To achieve comparability, test items must be independent of language specificities, test-takers should be homogeneous in their ability to solve the test items, and the test setting must be standardised across test-takers. Using process data in assessments is often limited to identifying cognitive response mechanisms. On the other hand, little is known about how process data can contribute to multilingual assessments' test development and administration process, hence, quality assurance. Based on the existing literature, we conceptualise a framework with five aspects of how process data can be used for assessment quality improvement. In addition, we set these aspects into the context of multilingual digital-based assessments. We illustrate three ways in which process data can contribute to the quality assurance of standardised educational digital-based assessments - a) assisting in identifying suspicious items or blocks across different languages, b) investigating potential issues of position effects and how they might affect different languages and c) clustering test-takers to understand their evolving behaviour. This strand of research aims to contribute to a better understanding of how process data in digital-based assessments can contribute to quality assurance and inform assessment developers, practitioners, and researchers in large-scale assessments.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/hyz4q_v1
Primary Topic
Higher Education Learning Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of process data to advance digital-based multilingual assessments

Martin Hlosta, Per Bergamin, Sukanya Nath, Jessica M. E. Herzing et al.
Higher Education Learning Practices
article

Analysis of process data to advance digital-based multilingual assessments

Martin Hlosta, Per Bergamin, Sukanya Nath, Jessica M. E. Herzing, Florian Keller Zai, Andrea B. Erzinger, Simon Seiler
article en

Abstract

Unlike traditional large-scale assessments, digital-based assessments collect process data that provide information about test-takers' actions in the assessment platform while solving test items, e.g., response and reaction times, number of clicks, and skipping. In multilingual digital-based assessments, the comparability of test scores across different assessment languages is essential and challenges assessment design principles regarding fairness. To achieve comparability, test items must be independent of language specificities, test-takers should be homogeneous in their ability to solve the test items, and the test setting must be standardised across test-takers. Using process data in assessments is often limited to identifying cognitive response mechanisms. On the other hand, little is known about how process data can contribute to multilingual assessments' test development and administration process, hence, quality assurance. Based on the existing literature, we conceptualise a framework with five aspects of how process data can be used for assessment quality improvement. In addition, we set these aspects into the context of multilingual digital-based assessments. We illustrate three ways in which process data can contribute to the quality assurance of standardised educational digital-based assessments - a) assisting in identifying suspicious items or blocks across different languages, b) investigating potential issues of position effects and how they might affect different languages and c) clustering test-takers to understand their evolving behaviour. This strand of research aims to contribute to a better understanding of how process data in digital-based assessments can contribute to quality assurance and inform assessment developers, practitioners, and researchers in large-scale assessments.

Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Higher Education Learning Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.