The Space that Refuge Makes: Rethinking Displacements and Protection

Abstract Space is foundational to questions of refuge and asylum, but this space is one of conditional hospitality, extended to those deemed worthy of protection by virtue of their victimhood, while physically and discursively excluding others who share similar life circumstances but are deemed unworthy. Space here is understood to be mutually constituted with the social. Hence, refuge is constituted through bodies that are cast out of national belonging, and refugees and asylum-seekers are simultaneously defined through the ‘protection space’ of the refuge and asylum. But in an age of displacement, how do refuge and asylum seek to construct a specific group of people that are distinct from the poor, and how is this distinction problematic? This article sets out to unpack part of this puzzle through an urban lens. Using urban research around shelter and housing, I demonstrate how that is used to separate communities. I argue that refuge and asylum promise safe spaces but strip people of mobility and futures, while poor citizens are denied the promise of secure land and housing, exploited for their labour, and compelled to live a life of constant displacement. This article demonstrates how these differences, shaped against each other, are relational, and asks if we can reimagine the city as a protection space for all.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Refugee Survey Quarterly
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdaf014
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Space that Refuge Makes: Rethinking Displacements and Protection

Romola Sanyal
1 citations
Refugee Survey Quarterly
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
4.20
article

The Space that Refuge Makes: Rethinking Displacements and Protection

Romola Sanyal
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Space is foundational to questions of refuge and asylum, but this space is one of conditional hospitality, extended to those deemed worthy of protection by virtue of their victimhood, while physically and discursively excluding others who share similar life circumstances but are deemed unworthy. Space here is understood to be mutually constituted with the social. Hence, refuge is constituted through bodies that are cast out of national belonging, and refugees and asylum-seekers are simultaneously defined through the ‘protection space’ of the refuge and asylum. But in an age of displacement, how do refuge and asylum seek to construct a specific group of people that are distinct from the poor, and how is this distinction problematic? This article sets out to unpack part of this puzzle through an urban lens. Using urban research around shelter and housing, I demonstrate how that is used to separate communities. I argue that refuge and asylum promise safe spaces but strip people of mobility and futures, while poor citizens are denied the promise of secure land and housing, exploited for their labour, and compelled to live a life of constant displacement. This article demonstrates how these differences, shaped against each other, are relational, and asks if we can reimagine the city as a protection space for all.

Refugee Survey QuarterlyVol. 44(3)
London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.