A Scoping Review of Guidelines for Mercury Limits in Soil, Water, and Air: How Do Brazil’s Standards Compare to International and Developed Country Guidelines?

Mercury is a global problem for both human and environmental health. The Minamata Convention on Mercury entered into force in 2017, joining efforts of 151 countries, mostly in the Global South. Many of them are still in the process of incorporating these international concepts into domestic practice. This includes Brazil, which has been a signatory of the Convention since 2013. Since the country includes 70% of the Amazon, which is the region responsible for approximately 40% of the global emissions and 80% of South America′s emissions, it plays quite an important role in the Convention. For the successful implementation of the Convention, efforts must be made to bridge the gap between policymakers and academic knowledge when setting mercury limits. As a first step, this study followed the PRISMA-ScR guidelines and used references exclusively within this scope to perform a systematic search of guidelines with recommended limits for mercury in soil, water, and air. The documents retrieved by this approach were compared, bringing together insights and recommendations, especially for Brazil and the Amazonian context. While not exhaustive, the number, geographical diversity, and recency of the documents (guidelines) allow for the establishment of benchmarks through comparative analysis and the formulation of recommendations that could potentially be adopted by other Amazonian countries (or even other countries in the Global South), while respecting their specific differences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Chemical Health & Safety
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chas.5c00065
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Mercury impact and mitigation studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Scoping Review of Guidelines for Mercury Limits in Soil, Water, and Air: How Do Brazil’s Standards Compare to International and Developed Country Guidelines?

Marcus Augusto‐Oliveira, Carlos Barbosa Alves de Souza, Letícia Santos-Sacramento, Gabriela de Paula Arrifano et al.
2 citations
ACS Chemical Health & Safety
Mercury impact and mitigation studies
2.40
article

A Scoping Review of Guidelines for Mercury Limits in Soil, Water, and Air: How Do Brazil’s Standards Compare to International and Developed Country Guidelines?

Marcus Augusto‐Oliveira, Carlos Barbosa Alves de Souza, Letícia Santos-Sacramento, Gabriela de Paula Arrifano, Marcelo Oliveira‐da‐Costa, Maria Elena Crespo‐López, Caio Gustavo Leal-Nazaré, Isabela Soares-Silva, Fernanda P. Arrifano, Camila Lago-Pinheiro, Gabriel Paiva-Canelas
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Mercury is a global problem for both human and environmental health. The Minamata Convention on Mercury entered into force in 2017, joining efforts of 151 countries, mostly in the Global South. Many of them are still in the process of incorporating these international concepts into domestic practice. This includes Brazil, which has been a signatory of the Convention since 2013. Since the country includes 70% of the Amazon, which is the region responsible for approximately 40% of the global emissions and 80% of South America′s emissions, it plays quite an important role in the Convention. For the successful implementation of the Convention, efforts must be made to bridge the gap between policymakers and academic knowledge when setting mercury limits. As a first step, this study followed the PRISMA-ScR guidelines and used references exclusively within this scope to perform a systematic search of guidelines with recommended limits for mercury in soil, water, and air. The documents retrieved by this approach were compared, bringing together insights and recommendations, especially for Brazil and the Amazonian context. While not exhaustive, the number, geographical diversity, and recency of the documents (guidelines) allow for the establishment of benchmarks through comparative analysis and the formulation of recommendations that could potentially be adopted by other Amazonian countries (or even other countries in the Global South), while respecting their specific differences.

ACS Chemical Health & SafetyVol. 32(5)
Amazon (United States) (US), WWF Colombia (CO), WWF Tanzania (TZ), Applied Behavioral Research (United States) (US), Universidade Federal do Pará (BR)
World Health Organization, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Fundação Amazônia Paraense de Amparo à Pesquisa, Universidade Federal do Pará, Environmental Protection Administration, Executive Yuan, R.O.C. Taiwan, Directorate for Biological Sciences, Health Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Mercury impact and mitigation studies
2.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.