Weighing options for passive environmental neutron dosimetry: A comparative study of PADCs, TLDs, OSLDs, and fission track detectors

This study aims to evaluate the potential of polyallyl diglycol carbonate (PADC) detectors, coupled with 6 LiF converters, for passive environmental neutron dosimetry. Their performance is compared against three other methods, fission track detectors, thermoluminescent detectors (TLDs), and optically stimulated luminescence detectors (OSLDs), to determine their viability for passive routine neutron monitoring in environmental settings. The four detector types investigated (PADCs, fission tracks, TLDs and OSLDs) were placed in a moderator sphere and exposed to an AmBe neutron field. The measurements evaluated the dose response, measurement range, and precision of each system. Results confirm that the advantage of the track detectors (PADC or fission track) is their gamma insensitivity: the TLD and OSLD methods require the combination of neutron-sensitive with neutron-insensitive detectors, as both are gamma-sensitive. This translated into a detection limit H ∗ ( 10 ) =6 μ Sv for PADC detectors coupled with 6 LiF converters, comparable to that of fission track detectors (3 μ Sv). In contrast, the gamma-sensitive luminescence systems showed a detection limit of 50 μ Sv for the TLDs and 180 μ Sv for the OSLDs under AmBe neutron irradiations. This worsens under simulated environmental conditions, where a significant gamma contribution is expected, as demonstrated by a test where mixed gamma/neutron irradiation was used. These results indicate the potential of the PADC coupled with a 6 LiF converter system as a robust alternative to fission track detectors for passive environmental neutron dosimetry. • A novel environmental neutron dosimetry system using PADCs coupled with 6 LiF converters was tested. • Performance was benchmarked against fission track, TLD, and OSLD systems in AmBe neutron fields. • PADCs and fission tracks showed the lowest detection limits ( H *(10) = 6 μ Sv and 3 μ Sv, respectively). • PADCs and fission track systems are insensitive to gamma, improving detection in mixed fields.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Radiation Measurements
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2025.107504
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Nuclear Physics and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.77

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Weighing options for passive environmental neutron dosimetry: A comparative study of PADCs, TLDs, OSLDs, and fission track detectors

Jeppe Brage Christensen, E.G. Yukihara, Alberto Stabilini, Sabine Mayer et al.
2 citations
Radiation Measurements
Nuclear Physics and Applications
3.77
article

Weighing options for passive environmental neutron dosimetry: A comparative study of PADCs, TLDs, OSLDs, and fission track detectors

Jeppe Brage Christensen, E.G. Yukihara, Alberto Stabilini, Sabine Mayer, M. U. Sliz, Lily Bossin, Federico Alejandro Geser, M. Kasprzak
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the potential of polyallyl diglycol carbonate (PADC) detectors, coupled with 6 LiF converters, for passive environmental neutron dosimetry. Their performance is compared against three other methods, fission track detectors, thermoluminescent detectors (TLDs), and optically stimulated luminescence detectors (OSLDs), to determine their viability for passive routine neutron monitoring in environmental settings. The four detector types investigated (PADCs, fission tracks, TLDs and OSLDs) were placed in a moderator sphere and exposed to an AmBe neutron field. The measurements evaluated the dose response, measurement range, and precision of each system. Results confirm that the advantage of the track detectors (PADC or fission track) is their gamma insensitivity: the TLD and OSLD methods require the combination of neutron-sensitive with neutron-insensitive detectors, as both are gamma-sensitive. This translated into a detection limit H ∗ ( 10 ) =6 μ Sv for PADC detectors coupled with 6 LiF converters, comparable to that of fission track detectors (3 μ Sv). In contrast, the gamma-sensitive luminescence systems showed a detection limit of 50 μ Sv for the TLDs and 180 μ Sv for the OSLDs under AmBe neutron irradiations. This worsens under simulated environmental conditions, where a significant gamma contribution is expected, as demonstrated by a test where mixed gamma/neutron irradiation was used. These results indicate the potential of the PADC coupled with a 6 LiF converter system as a robust alternative to fission track detectors for passive environmental neutron dosimetry. • A novel environmental neutron dosimetry system using PADCs coupled with 6 LiF converters was tested. • Performance was benchmarked against fission track, TLD, and OSLD systems in AmBe neutron fields. • PADCs and fission tracks showed the lowest detection limits ( H *(10) = 6 μ Sv and 3 μ Sv, respectively). • PADCs and fission track systems are insensitive to gamma, improving detection in mixed fields.

Radiation MeasurementsVol. 188
Paul Scherrer Institute (CH)
Eidgenössisches Nuklearsicherheitsinspektorat
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Nuclear Physics and Applications
3.77
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.