Environmental sustainability assessment of different strategies for the treatment of wastewater from textile industry

Severe water consumption and highly polluted wastewater are the main issues of textile industries, which can affect environmental safety. Advanced oxidation processes (AOP) emerged as innovative strategies to enhance conventional wastewater treatments, for their strong ability to reduce chemical oxygen demand (COD) and pollutants. Among these, hydrodynamic cavitation (HC) stands out as a promising technique to minimize the chemical additive uses, thereby improving the process sustainability. A life cycle assessment (LCA) was conducted to compare four scenarios, traditional biological treatment, membrane treatment combined with AOP and HC used either as pre- or post-treatment to the biological process. The results showed that biological process followed by HC offers the lowest environmental impact. This is attributed to a configuration change (compared to HC as pre-treatment) that reduces energy consumption without compromising water quality. In the climate change category, one of the most relevant, HC as a post-treatment (scenario 4) reduces the impact by 94%, compared to HC pre-treatment (scenario 3). It also achieves around 30% impact reduction relative to biological treatment, while ensuring the highest water quality, with a 98% reduction in COD. This quality supports the potential for water recirculation within textile manufacturing. Furthermore, the possibility of water reuse offsets the environmental cost of producing high-quality water, with an average environmental credit between 440 (scenario 3) and 600 (scenario 1) m³-world eq, in the water use category. The superiority of the HC post-treatment setup was also confirmed from a performance standpoint, as it reduces the complexity of process management. • Four treatments for wastewater from textile industry were assessed by LCA approach • Hydrodynamic cavitation ensures 98% COD decrease, reducing chemical additives use • Hydrodynamic cavitation allows wastewater recirculation within textile manufacture • Hydrodynamic cavitation as post-treatment is the most sustainable process setup • LCA proved that post-treatment combines technical gain with environmental benefit

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of environmental chemical engineering
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2025.118761
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.99
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Environmental sustainability assessment of different strategies for the treatment of wastewater from textile industry

Alessia Amato, Merli Giulia, Prisciandaro Marina, Ayedi Karima et al.
2 citations
Journal of environmental chemical engineering
Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
1.99
article

Environmental sustainability assessment of different strategies for the treatment of wastewater from textile industry

Alessia Amato, Merli Giulia, Prisciandaro Marina, Ayedi Karima, Innocenzi Valentina
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Severe water consumption and highly polluted wastewater are the main issues of textile industries, which can affect environmental safety. Advanced oxidation processes (AOP) emerged as innovative strategies to enhance conventional wastewater treatments, for their strong ability to reduce chemical oxygen demand (COD) and pollutants. Among these, hydrodynamic cavitation (HC) stands out as a promising technique to minimize the chemical additive uses, thereby improving the process sustainability. A life cycle assessment (LCA) was conducted to compare four scenarios, traditional biological treatment, membrane treatment combined with AOP and HC used either as pre- or post-treatment to the biological process. The results showed that biological process followed by HC offers the lowest environmental impact. This is attributed to a configuration change (compared to HC as pre-treatment) that reduces energy consumption without compromising water quality. In the climate change category, one of the most relevant, HC as a post-treatment (scenario 4) reduces the impact by 94%, compared to HC pre-treatment (scenario 3). It also achieves around 30% impact reduction relative to biological treatment, while ensuring the highest water quality, with a 98% reduction in COD. This quality supports the potential for water recirculation within textile manufacturing. Furthermore, the possibility of water reuse offsets the environmental cost of producing high-quality water, with an average environmental credit between 440 (scenario 3) and 600 (scenario 1) m³-world eq, in the water use category. The superiority of the HC post-treatment setup was also confirmed from a performance standpoint, as it reduces the complexity of process management. • Four treatments for wastewater from textile industry were assessed by LCA approach • Hydrodynamic cavitation ensures 98% COD decrease, reducing chemical additives use • Hydrodynamic cavitation allows wastewater recirculation within textile manufacture • Hydrodynamic cavitation as post-treatment is the most sustainable process setup • LCA proved that post-treatment combines technical gain with environmental benefit

Journal of environmental chemical engineeringVol. 13(5)
Marche Polytechnic University (IT), University of L'Aquila (IT)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
1.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.