Interactive metadiscourse across languages and writer groups

Abstract Although English has become a lingua franca for academic publication, a growing number of multilingual scholars prefer to publish in both English and their first languages. This corpus-based study investigates how Chinese scholars in applied linguistics deploy interactive metadiscourse in their published Chinese and L2 English research articles, compared with those of L1 English writers. Both Chinese character( zì )-based and word( cí )-based units were used to segment and quantify the Chinese corpus, yielding two contrasting sets of results in the cross-linguistic comparisons. To ensure a conceptually equivalent comparison, we opted for word-based results, showing that the L1 Chinese corpus evidenced more frequent interactive metadiscoursal features than both the L1 and L2 English corpora. The latter two corpora, by contrast, revealed similar patterns of distribution. The divergences and convergences between Chinese and English corpora indicate linguacultural influences on interactive metadiscourse and reveal the methodological constraints on analysis of similar linguistic features.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.22116.gon
Primary Topic
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interactive metadiscourse across languages and writer groups

Feng Cao, Heng Gong, Lingling Liu
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
article

Interactive metadiscourse across languages and writer groups

Feng Cao, Heng Gong, Lingling Liu
article en

Abstract

Abstract Although English has become a lingua franca for academic publication, a growing number of multilingual scholars prefer to publish in both English and their first languages. This corpus-based study investigates how Chinese scholars in applied linguistics deploy interactive metadiscourse in their published Chinese and L2 English research articles, compared with those of L1 English writers. Both Chinese character( zì )-based and word( cí )-based units were used to segment and quantify the Chinese corpus, yielding two contrasting sets of results in the cross-linguistic comparisons. To ensure a conceptually equivalent comparison, we opted for word-based results, showing that the L1 Chinese corpus evidenced more frequent interactive metadiscoursal features than both the L1 and L2 English corpora. The latter two corpora, by contrast, revealed similar patterns of distribution. The divergences and convergences between Chinese and English corpora indicate linguacultural influences on interactive metadiscourse and reveal the methodological constraints on analysis of similar linguistic features.

International Journal of Corpus LinguisticsVol. 30(3)
Fujian Normal University (CN), Australian National University (AU), University of Auckland (NZ), China Three Gorges University (CN), National University of Singapore (SG), Zhejiang University (CN)
China Scholarship Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Interactive metadiscourse across languages and writer groups — Feng Cao, Heng Gong, et al. · International Journal of Corpus Linguistics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS