Wellbore risk levels prediction based on BO-CatBoost model and rough set theory

Abstract To address the issues of high computational complexity and insufficient prediction accuracy in traditional wellbore stability prediction methods, this paper employs an approach that integrates rough set theory (RST) with machine learning (ML). First, RST was applied to reduce the attributes of 14 drilling feature parameters that influence wellbore risk levels, eliminating redundant information and retaining the 7 key parameters: displacement, drilling fluid density, azimuth angle, annular pressure loss, RMP, standpipe pressure, and drilling speed. Next, ML techniques were employed to predict wellbore risk levels, with the CatBoost model being selected. This model’s performance was compared with that of random forest (RF) and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) models. The results demonstrated that the CatBoost model performed excellently in terms of prediction accuracy, achieving a prediction accuracy of 87.47% without optimization, significantly higher than the RF model (75.69%) and the XGBoost model (72.18%). Furthermore, Bayesian optimization was applied to optimize the hyperparameters of the CatBoost model, resulting in an improved prediction accuracy of 93.25%, which represents a 5.78% increase over the unoptimized version. Finally, the model was applied to predict the wellbore risk levels in different datasets, with the predicted results showing a high degree of consistency with the actual field conditions, thereby demonstrating the model’s practicality and potential.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Measurement Science and Technology
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/adfc8e
Primary Topic
Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Wellbore risk levels prediction based on BO-CatBoost model and rough set theory

Minghe Yang, Xiuyu Cai, Kai Xu, Peng Ni et al.
1 links
Measurement Science and Technology
Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic
article

Wellbore risk levels prediction based on BO-CatBoost model and rough set theory

Minghe Yang, Xiuyu Cai, Kai Xu, Peng Ni, Xuan Zhong
article en

Abstract

Abstract To address the issues of high computational complexity and insufficient prediction accuracy in traditional wellbore stability prediction methods, this paper employs an approach that integrates rough set theory (RST) with machine learning (ML). First, RST was applied to reduce the attributes of 14 drilling feature parameters that influence wellbore risk levels, eliminating redundant information and retaining the 7 key parameters: displacement, drilling fluid density, azimuth angle, annular pressure loss, RMP, standpipe pressure, and drilling speed. Next, ML techniques were employed to predict wellbore risk levels, with the CatBoost model being selected. This model’s performance was compared with that of random forest (RF) and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) models. The results demonstrated that the CatBoost model performed excellently in terms of prediction accuracy, achieving a prediction accuracy of 87.47% without optimization, significantly higher than the RF model (75.69%) and the XGBoost model (72.18%). Furthermore, Bayesian optimization was applied to optimize the hyperparameters of the CatBoost model, resulting in an improved prediction accuracy of 93.25%, which represents a 5.78% increase over the unoptimized version. Finally, the model was applied to predict the wellbore risk levels in different datasets, with the predicted results showing a high degree of consistency with the actual field conditions, thereby demonstrating the model’s practicality and potential.

Measurement Science and TechnologyVol. 36(8)
Sinopec (China) (CN), Georgia Institute of Technology (US), Yangtze University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.