Gray water dominance in water footprint assessment of shale oil: A lifecycle perspective

• Proposing the first comprehensive framework bridging WFN methodology with oilfield-specific regression models. • Quantifying wastewater treatment's critical role in shale oil footprint assessment. • Establishing comparative benchmarks across energy sources (coal: 23–33 L/GJ; natural gas: 11–26 L/GJ). Shale oil has emerged as a significant issue in global energy reform and sustainable development, recognized for its high water consumption. Existing water footprint studies, which predominantly focus on shale gas, inadequately address shale oil's unique resource characteristics and neglect key factors such as wastewater treatment. This study developed a Water Footprint Assessment Tool (WFAT) that integrates regression-based empirical models derived from historical shale oilfield data with the Water Footprint Network (WFN) methodology, aiming to holistically evaluate the water footprint across the entire shale oil production lifecycle. The WFAT systematically quantifies blue water footprint and incorporates the gray water footprint linked to wastewater treatment demands and energy-related indirect water footprint. When applied to a shale oilfield in Qingyang city, the WFAT results indicate a total water footprint of 107.39 m³/t, primarily driven by hydraulic fracturing process. Notably, the blue water footprint contributes merely 1.52% to the total footprint, while the gray water footprint dominates (98.15%), with fracturing-induced flowback water treatment being the largest contributor. Shale oil exhibits higher water use intensity (26.12 L/GJ) compared to shale gas (2.6 to 9.3 L/GJ) but aligns with coal and natural gas, and its produced water intensity (25.5 L/GJ) surpasses shale gas (3.9–7.3 L/GJ), reflecting greater water production attributed to geological-engineering synergies. The recycling rate of flowback water is identified as a pivotal parameter for footprint reduction through sensitivity analysis. This study provides a reference for water resource assessment and management to balance energy extraction with water conservation in water-stressed regions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Nexus
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nexus.2025.100503
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gray water dominance in water footprint assessment of shale oil: A lifecycle perspective

Qian Wang, Xi Chen, Jun Xiong, Bo Yuan et al.
1 citations
Energy Nexus
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
1.11
article

Gray water dominance in water footprint assessment of shale oil: A lifecycle perspective

Qian Wang, Xi Chen, Jun Xiong, Bo Yuan, Yan Wu, Wenshi Liu, Wu Jian
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• Proposing the first comprehensive framework bridging WFN methodology with oilfield-specific regression models. • Quantifying wastewater treatment's critical role in shale oil footprint assessment. • Establishing comparative benchmarks across energy sources (coal: 23–33 L/GJ; natural gas: 11–26 L/GJ). Shale oil has emerged as a significant issue in global energy reform and sustainable development, recognized for its high water consumption. Existing water footprint studies, which predominantly focus on shale gas, inadequately address shale oil's unique resource characteristics and neglect key factors such as wastewater treatment. This study developed a Water Footprint Assessment Tool (WFAT) that integrates regression-based empirical models derived from historical shale oilfield data with the Water Footprint Network (WFN) methodology, aiming to holistically evaluate the water footprint across the entire shale oil production lifecycle. The WFAT systematically quantifies blue water footprint and incorporates the gray water footprint linked to wastewater treatment demands and energy-related indirect water footprint. When applied to a shale oilfield in Qingyang city, the WFAT results indicate a total water footprint of 107.39 m³/t, primarily driven by hydraulic fracturing process. Notably, the blue water footprint contributes merely 1.52% to the total footprint, while the gray water footprint dominates (98.15%), with fracturing-induced flowback water treatment being the largest contributor. Shale oil exhibits higher water use intensity (26.12 L/GJ) compared to shale gas (2.6 to 9.3 L/GJ) but aligns with coal and natural gas, and its produced water intensity (25.5 L/GJ) surpasses shale gas (3.9–7.3 L/GJ), reflecting greater water production attributed to geological-engineering synergies. The recycling rate of flowback water is identified as a pivotal parameter for footprint reduction through sensitivity analysis. This study provides a reference for water resource assessment and management to balance energy extraction with water conservation in water-stressed regions.

Energy NexusVol. 19
Southwest Petroleum University (CN), PetroChina Southwest Oil and Gas Field Company (China), University of Cincinnati (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.