High-precision airborne LiDAR remains essential for urban forestry: Revealing the limitations of recent large-scale canopy height products in urban contexts

• Evaluated four recent large-scale CHMs against airborne LiDAR in urban contexts. • Revealed consistent accuracy limitations across CHMs. • Urban built-up environments influence CHM height prediction accuracy. • Airborne LiDAR remains essential for urban forestry applications. • Developing urban-optimized CHMs using locally calibrated, high-resolution models fused with contextual deep learning. Urban trees play a crucial role in delivering ecosystem services, yet their structural complexity poses significant challenges for remote sensing. Although recent large-scale, open-access canopy height models (CHMs) offer potential alternatives to airborne LiDAR, their suitability for urban environments remains uncertain. This study systematically evaluated four prominent CHMs (Potapov, Lang, Tolan, and Malambo) using high-resolution airborne LiDAR data from Washington, D.C., with complementary analyses from four additional cities. We assessed their performance in both canopy classification and height prediction using classification and regression metrics, spatial autocorrelation, consistency tests, and explainable machine learning. Results revealed consistent limitations across products, including widespread misclassification of canopy, systematic tree height prediction biases — characterized by overestimation of low and underestimation of high canopies (the OLUH effect) — and pronounced spatial clustering of errors along urban–forest edges. Among the models, only the Lang CHM passed the Bland–Altman consistency test, showing marginal statistical agreement with reference data. Tree characteristic variables, especially canopy height itself, emerged as dominant drivers of height errors, while topography and built-up context also contributed. Consistent patterns observed across four additional cities indicated that these limitations are systemic rather than location-specific. We conclude that high-precision airborne LiDAR remains essential for urban forestry and recommend enhancing canopy height mapping techniques to better capture the structure of urban trees. A promising direction is the development of urban-specific CHMs with finer spatial and temporal resolution, improved temporal consistency, and integration with high-resolution imagery, contextual deep learning models, and local calibration strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2025.104791
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

High-precision airborne LiDAR remains essential for urban forestry: Revealing the limitations of recent large-scale canopy height products in urban contexts

Guofan Shao, Zhibang Xu, Haobin Dong, Ting Lan et al.
4 citations
International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
3.20
article

High-precision airborne LiDAR remains essential for urban forestry: Revealing the limitations of recent large-scale canopy height products in urban contexts

Guofan Shao, Zhibang Xu, Haobin Dong, Ting Lan, Lina Tang, J. Wu
article en
4 citations

Abstract

• Evaluated four recent large-scale CHMs against airborne LiDAR in urban contexts. • Revealed consistent accuracy limitations across CHMs. • Urban built-up environments influence CHM height prediction accuracy. • Airborne LiDAR remains essential for urban forestry applications. • Developing urban-optimized CHMs using locally calibrated, high-resolution models fused with contextual deep learning. Urban trees play a crucial role in delivering ecosystem services, yet their structural complexity poses significant challenges for remote sensing. Although recent large-scale, open-access canopy height models (CHMs) offer potential alternatives to airborne LiDAR, their suitability for urban environments remains uncertain. This study systematically evaluated four prominent CHMs (Potapov, Lang, Tolan, and Malambo) using high-resolution airborne LiDAR data from Washington, D.C., with complementary analyses from four additional cities. We assessed their performance in both canopy classification and height prediction using classification and regression metrics, spatial autocorrelation, consistency tests, and explainable machine learning. Results revealed consistent limitations across products, including widespread misclassification of canopy, systematic tree height prediction biases — characterized by overestimation of low and underestimation of high canopies (the OLUH effect) — and pronounced spatial clustering of errors along urban–forest edges. Among the models, only the Lang CHM passed the Bland–Altman consistency test, showing marginal statistical agreement with reference data. Tree characteristic variables, especially canopy height itself, emerged as dominant drivers of height errors, while topography and built-up context also contributed. Consistent patterns observed across four additional cities indicated that these limitations are systemic rather than location-specific. We conclude that high-precision airborne LiDAR remains essential for urban forestry and recommend enhancing canopy height mapping techniques to better capture the structure of urban trees. A promising direction is the development of urban-specific CHMs with finer spatial and temporal resolution, improved temporal consistency, and integration with high-resolution imagery, contextual deep learning models, and local calibration strategies.

International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and GeoinformationVol. 143
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Purdue University West Lafayette (US), Institute of Urban Environment (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
3.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.